
As far as I can remember, since I've started trading 10 years ago, Nouriel Roubini has been predicting Doom and Gloom.
I've never seem him mentioned anything good about the economy.
After so many years of wrong prediction, when he was right about the financial crisis, the media see him as a credible analyst.
I don't really believe Nouriel Roubini, because even a broken clock is right twice a day.
This is my personal views, don't take it too seriously.
Good luck to all.
pharoah88 ( Date: 19-Jul-2010 15:03) Posted:
|
pharoah88 ( Date: 19-Jul-2010 15:03) Posted:
|
Comment
&analysis today Monday July 19, 2010 12Fasten seatbelts for a double dip
The global slowdown will accelerate in the second half — and policymakers are running out of tools
Nouriel Roubini
T
Worse yet, the fundamental excesses that fuelled the crisis — too much debt and leverage in the private sector (households, banks and other financial institutions, and even much of the corporate sector) — have not been addressed.
Private-sector deleveraging has barely begun. Moreover, there is now massive releveraging of the public sector in advanced economies, with huge Budget deficits and public-debt accumulation driven by automatic stabilisers, counter-cyclical Keynesian fiscal stimulus, and the immense costs of socialising the financial system’s losses.
At best, we face a protracted period of anaemic, below-trend growth in advanced economies as deleveraging by households, financial institutions and governments starts to feed through to consumption and investment.
At the global level, the countries that spent too much — the United States, the United Kingdom, Spain, Greece and elsewhere — now need to deleverage and are spending, consuming and importing less.
But countries that saved too much — China, emerging Asia, Germany and Japan — are not spending more to compensate for the fall in spending by deleveraging countries. Thus, the recovery of global aggregate demand will be weak, pushing global growth much lower.
The global slowdown — already evident in second-quarter data for this year — will accelerate in the second half of the year. Fiscal stimulus will disappear as austerity programmes take hold in most countries. Inventory adjustments, which boosted growth for a few quarters, will run their course.
The effects of tax policies that stole demand from the future — such as incentives for buyers of cars and homes — will diminish as programmes expire. Labour-market conditions remain weak, with little job creation and a spreading sense of malaise among consumers.
he global economy, artificially boosted since the recession of 2008-2009 by massive monetary and fiscal stimulus and financial bailouts, is headed towards a sharp slowdown this year as the effect of these measures wanes.Outlook: US mediocre, euro zone worse
The likely scenario for advanced economies is a mediocre U-shaped recovery, even if we avoid a W-shaped double dip.
In the US, annual growth was already below trend in the first half of this year (2.7 per cent in the first quarter and estimated at a mediocre 2.2 per cent in April-June). Growth is set to slow further, to 1.5 per cent in the second half of this year and into next year.
Whatever letter of the alphabet US economic performance ultimately resembles, what is coming will feel like a recession.
Mediocre job creation and a further rise in unemployment, larger cyclical Budget deficits, a fresh fall in home prices, larger losses by banks on mortgages, consumer credit, and other loans, and the risk that
Congress will adopt protectionist measures against China will see to that. In the euro zone, the outlook is worse.
Growth may be close to zero by the end of this year, as fiscal austerity kicks in and stock markets fall.
Sharp rises in sovereign, corporate and interbank liquidity spreads will increase the cost of capital and increases in risk aversion, volatility and sovereign risk will undermine business, investor and consumer confidence further. The weakening of the euro will help Europe’s external balance but the benefits will be more than offset by the damage to export and growth prospects in the US, China and emerging Asia.
Even China is showing signs of a slowdown, owing to the government’s attempts to control economic overheating. The slowdown in advanced economies, together with a weaker euro, will further dent Chinese growth, bringing its 11-per-cent-plus growth rate towards 7 per cent by the end of this year.
This is bad news for export growth in the rest of Asia and among commodity–rich countries, which increasingly rely on Chinese imports. An important victim will be Japan, where anaemic real income growth is depressing domestic demand and exports to China sustain what little growth there is. Japan also suffers from low potential growth, owing to a lack of structural reforms and weak and ineffective governments (four prime ministers in four years), a large stock of public debt, unfavourable demographic trends and a strong yen that gets stronger during bouts of global risk aversion.
Any number of shocksA scenario in which US growth slumps to 1.5 per cent, the euro zone and Japan stagnate and China’s growth slows below 8 per cent may not imply a global contraction but, as in the US, it will feel like one.
And any additional shock could tip this unstable global economy back into fullfledged recession.
The potential sources of such a shock are legion. The euro zone’s sovereign-risk problems could worsen, leading to another round of asset-price corrections, global risk aversion, volatility and financial contagion.
A vicious cycle of asset-price correction and weaker growth, together with downside surprises that are not currently priced by markets, could lead to further asset price declines and even weaker growth — a dynamic that drove the global economy into recession in the first place.
And one cannot exclude the possibility of an Israeli military strike on Iran in the next 12 months. If that happens, oil prices could rapidly spike and, as in the summer of 2008, trigger a global recession.
Finally, policymakers are running out of tools. Additional monetary quantitative easing will make little difference, there is little room for further fiscal stimulus in most advanced economies and the ability to bail out financial institutions that are too big to fail — but also too big to be saved — will be sharply constrained.
So, as the optimists’ delusional hopes for a rapid V-shaped recovery evaporate, the advanced world will be at best in a long U-shaped recovery, which in some cases — the euro zone and Japan — may be long enough to stretch into an L-shaped neardepression.
Avoiding double-dip recession will be difficult.
In such a world, recovery in the stronger emerging markets — the great hope for the global economy — will suffer, because no country is an island economically. Indeed, growth in many emerging-market economies — starting with China — is highly dependent on retrenching advanced economies.
Fasten your seat belts for a very bumpy ride.
Project SyndicateNouriel Roubini is Chairman of Roubini Global Economics (www.roubini.com), Professor at the Stern School of Business, New York University, and co-author of the book Crisis Economics.
This commentary is exclusive to
Today in Singapore.STI lower at midday
SINGAPORE shares were lower at midday on Monday, with the benchmark Straits Times Index at 2,953.69, down 0.13 per cent, or 4.03 points.
About 508.5 million shares exchanged hands.
Losers beat gainers 236 to 89.
Hulumas ( Date: 18-Jul-2010 21:58) Posted:
|
boyikao3 ( Date: 18-Jul-2010 21:48) Posted:
|

Hulumas ( Date: 18-Jul-2010 17:41) Posted:
|
On Friday, S & P 500 slumped sharply due to worsen consumer’s sentiment and close at 1065.
The long black candle sticks with little lower shadow indicate that investors have no hesitation in selling down the stock market due to fear.
Both RSI & MACD are still bullish though RSI performed a very sharp down tick on Friday.
Important Resistance of S&P 500: 1103
Immediate Support of S&P 500: 1040
Currently S&P 500 are well below the 20/50/100/200 days MA and index fail to break out of down trend channel as shown on the charts.
As of now, traders are all eyeing on the Head and shoulder pattern critical neckline at 1040 and see if its can hold.
If S&P 500 managed to rebound off this support, it will boast confidence into investors which in turn continue to buy stocks.
However if the support were to be breached at high volume, fears will come into the investors and massive selling down will begin.
SEE ANALYSIS FOR ST ENG
Therefore with such bearish sentiments at Wall Street, we would not encourage anyone to enter at this timing even though STI seems to be less affected.
boyikao3 ( Date: 17-Jul-2010 22:27) Posted:
|
Hulumas ( Date: 17-Jul-2010 15:15) Posted:
|
boyikao3 ( Date: 17-Jul-2010 14:58) Posted:
|

Hulumas ( Date: 16-Jul-2010 09:39) Posted:
|
China pares US debt holdings
WASHINGTON
The cash-rich Chinese government reduced its US Treasury bond holdings to US$867.7 billion ($1.2 trillion) from US$900.2 billion in April, the Treasury said in a report on international capital flows.
China, the world’s largest holder of foreign-exchange reserves, had raised its holdings in the prior two months from a 2010 low of US$877.5 billion in February.
Still, China remained far ahead as the top foreign debt holder, followed by Japan, which also pared its holdings, to US$786.7 billion from US$795.5 billion in April. Britain increased its holdings to US$350.0 billion from US$321.2 billion in April.
Overall, net Treasury international capital (TIC) flows fell 57 per cent to US$35.4 billion in May, the data showed, suggesting easing concerns about the European debt crisis.
“The May TIC data along with the latest US trade results point to less upward pressure on the greenback, which is good news for American exporters,” said Tu Packard at Moody’s Economy.com.
“However, the outlook can change on a dime during this period of transition and considerable uncertainty. The sovereign-debt crisis in Europe still simmers, and the Fed has revised down its 2010 growth forecast.”
The Federal Reserve on Wednesday lowered its 2010 growth forecast for the world’s largest economy, to 3.0 to 3.5 per cent, from the 3.2 to 3.7 per cent range predicted just months ago.
In March, net TIC flows hit a record US$141.4 billion as investors around the world pulled capital from the euro zone on concerns that bloc member Greece was on the brink of a sovereign-debt default.
Stocks poised to slip
LONDON (CNNMoney.com) -- U.S. stocks were poised for a lower open Friday, as investors digested Google's latest results and awaited more bank earnings.
At 5:14 a.m. ET, Dow Jones industrial average (INDU), S&P 500 (SPX) and Nasdaq (COMP) futures were slightly lower.
Futures measure current index values against perceived future performance.
U.S. stocks ended little changed Thursday as worries about economic growth resurfaced, casting a shadow over the mostly positive start to the corporate reporting period.
Earnings: Google (GOOG, Fortune 500) reported a sharp rise in profit after U.S. markets closed Thursday. But the online search giant's earnings fell short of Wall Street's estimates.
Companies due to report ahead of Friday's opening bell include Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500), Citigroup (C, Fortune 500) and General Electric (GE, Fortune 500).
Economy: A report on consumer prices comes out at 8:30 a.m. ET. Investors will also take in the University of Michigan's survey on consumer sentiment, due out at 9:55 a.m. ET.
World markets: European shares were mixed in the early going. The DAX in Germany and France's CAC 40 were slightly below breakeven. Britain's FTSE 100 added 0.2%.
In Asia, Japan's Nikkei tumbled 2.9%. The Hang Seng in Hong Kong and the Shanghai Composite ended little changed.
FiNANCIAL REFORM: Long on pages, may fall short on goals
Critics see gaps, unintended consquences from new law
by John W. Schoen Senior Producer
Billed as the most sweeping financial reform since the 1930s, Congress has sent President Barack Obama a massive 2,300-page bill intended to prevent a repeat of the 2008 financial crisis.
Yet even before it becomes law, critics are warning that key provisions of the measure may fall short of what they were supposed to accomplish.
“I would say that nothing in this bill would have prevented the previous crisis — the one we are working our way through right now,” said William Isaac, former chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. "And it clearly won't prevent the next crisis."
The law sets broad guidelines for the existing patchwork of regulators — including the Federal Reserve, Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission — and establishes bodies to oversee consumer protection and monitor “systemic risk.”
Those regulators have been tasked with writing the Specific Rules of the road governing Limits on Risk-Taking by financial firms and previously Unregulated Trading. Other provisions are supposed to make it easier to Liquidate Large institutions that pose a risk to broader financial system. A new consumer protection bureau is supposed to guard against Lending Abuses.
But it will take years before the impact of the law is known. That’s because most of the specific regulations have yet to be written.
“The devil is in the details: There are a lot of unanswered question that were thrown to regulators," said Jay Brown, a professor of corporate and securities law at the University of Denver. “The reason it was thrown to regulators is because there are no answers. So for example: What’s too big to fail? Nobody knows the answer to that.”
The new law is being hailed as being “TOUGH on Wall Street.” But its passage is just the start of what is likely to be a hard-fought battle over the regulation of specific practices that nearly sank the global financial system.
"Unless your business model depends on cutting corners or bilking your customers, you have nothing to fear," Obama said after the vote. He said he will sign the bill next week.
By leaving so much to the discretion of existing regulators, the new law is “a boon to Wall Street lobbyists, who will now be working behind the scenes to influence the regulators,” according to John Taylor, president & CEO of the National Community Reinvestment Coalition.
“This is what happens when you allow the very industry that caused the problem to buy all the front-row seats at the bargaining table,” he said.
Other critics of the measure argue that REGULATORS — not regulations — were the MAJOR CAUSE of the financial meltdown.
The wave of predatory lending that sank the housing market, for example, could have been largely prevented if the Federal Reserve had enforced existing rules on mortgage lending, according to Cornelius Hurley, director of the Morin Center for Banking and Financial Law at Boston University.
“You can point the finger at one person who dropped the ball and that was ALAN GREENSPAN,” he said. “So the antidote to that is to ensure that an Alan Greenspan never happens again.”
Under the new law, banks and other financial institutions will be overseen by a council of regulators. That group will be charged with identifying the kinds of “systemic” risks that spun out of control in the collapse of Bear Stearns and Lehman Bros. in the financial panic of September 2008.
Our cartoonists examine the federal government's attempt at financial reform.
But there’s little to be gained by entrusting that task to the same regulators who failed to spot the causes of the panic the first time, said Isaac, the former FDIC head.
“If a bank went to the regulators and said, ‘We’ve got a good idea: we’re going to put our lending officers in charge of risk management,’ that bank would be put out of its misery immediately,” said Isaac. “That’s what the government just did. It put the regulators in charge of assessing their own performance. It’s a very bad system.”
The new law also sets up different rules for big banks — those with more than $10 billion in assets — and the rest of the industry. That means a handful of banks will continue to enjoy “too big to fail” status – complete with an implicit government guarantee that lowers their borrowing costs and gives then a competitive edge, according to Hurley.
“It enshrines for the foreseeable future that there are two parts of the financial system,” he said. “There are the six largest banks, which account for about 60 percent of the financial system, and then there is everybody else, from regional banks down to credit unions. The top six get a subsidy in the form of lower borrowing costs. And everybody else pays for it.”
The new law is also supposed to protect consumers from predatory lending and excessive bank fees. Backers of the newly authorized Consumer Financial Protection Board argued that existing regulators can’t keep consumer interests foremost if they are also charged with protecting the “safety and soundness” of the financial system.
While the law creates a separate agency with a single consumer mandate, it remains beholden to those regulators, who retain the power to veto its regulations and enforcement actions. That setup, said Taylor, could seriously hamper the board’s effectiveness.
“That club of regulators is very insular, and usually in agreement,” he said. “They can kill serious reform, and the financial lobby remains much more influential with regulators than consumer advocates."
It’s also not clear how the industry will respond to tougher new consumer protections once they are written. Efforts to restrict one set of bank fees, for example, could simply shift those consumer costs to another form of revenues for banks. If fee restrictions make some customers unprofitable, they may see their accounts canceled, according to Richard Bove, a bank industry anlayst at Rochdale Securiteis.
“My guess is there will be at least 10 million people who lose their bank accounts in the United States over the next 12 months, and they will not get banking services,” he said. “Which means that they will have to use payday loans, they'll have to use Western Union payment services, they'll have to use a series of other methods of handling their banking because they won't be profitable for banks and the banks won't keep them.”
Under the new law, banks that face higher capital requirements — designed to provide a greater cushion against bad loans — will have less money to lend. That could make it more difficult for businesses to borrow while the economy is struggling to get back on its feet.
Tighter lending regulations will also make it harder to get a mortgage, according to Howard Glaser, a mortgage industry consultant who served the Department of Housing and Urban Development in the Clinton administration.
“Consumers will see ‘safer’ mortgages, but fewer of them will qualify,” he said. “They will have fewer choices of mortgage lenders as the concentration of mortgage lending by a few big banks accelerates.”
© 2010 msnbc.com Reprints
Olive oil study questions 'extra virgin' claims
A University of California study shows that many of the olive oils sold in the United States are not the top-grade, extra-virgin oils that their labels proclaim
pharoah88 ( Date: 16-Jul-2010 09:36) Posted:
|
There's a moment that every oil-exporting country will experience, sooner or later.
The few select countries lucky enough to label themselves "oil exporter" know it — and have nightmares of the day their number is up.
Why the fright?
Because we live in a cutthroat, fossil fuel-driven world — a reality we have little chance of changing in our lifetime.