Post Reply
1-8 of 8
any other potential RTO companies around other than the ones that i m holding....EAGLE..........FirstLink.........?
Currently this company that i brought into is in divestment mode.....it is selling off all its asset.and business...as so it effectively is becoming a shell company............, as i have been thinking wat to do with the shares that i m holding.....that why hopefully by learning more about RTO in real live case study,,,,especially as mention by Mr hulumas ezyhealth to wilmar..... therefore hoprfully some sifu in this forum who has gone tru this RTO can share.....hehehe....a million thanks
THE
In a reverse takeover, shareholders of the private company purchase control of the public shell company and then merge it with the private company. The publicly traded corporation is called a "shell" since all that exists of the original company is its organizational structure. The private company shareholders receive a substantial majority of the shares of the public company and control of its board of directors. The transaction can be accomplished within weeks. If the shell is an SEC-registered company, the private company does not go through an expensive and time-consuming review with state and federal regulators because this process was completed beforehand with the public company.
The transaction involves the private and shell company exchanging information on each other, negotiating the merger terms, and signing a share exchange agreement. At the closing, the shell company issues a substantial majority of its shares and board control to the shareholders of the private company. The private company's shareholders pay for the shell company by contributing their shares in the private company to the shell company that they now control. This share exchange and change of control completes the reverse takeover, transforming the formerly privately held company into a publicly held company.
The advantages of public trading status include the possibility of commanding a higher price for a later offering of the company's securities. Going public through a reverse takeover allows a privately held company to become publicly held at a lesser cost, and with less stock dilution than through an initial public offering (IPO). While the process of going public and raising capital is combined in an IPO, in a reverse takeover, these two functions are separate. A company can go public without raising additional capital. Separating these two functions greatly simplifies the process.
In addition, a reverse takeover is less susceptible to market conditions. Conventional IPOs are risky for companies to undertake because the deal relies on market conditions, over which senior management has little control. If the market is off, the underwriter may pull the offering. The market also does not need to plunge wholesale. If a company in registration participates in an industry that's making unfavorable headlines, investors may shy away from the deal. In a reverse takeover, since the deal rests solely between those controlling the public and private companies, market conditions have little bearing on the situation.
The process for a conventional IPO can last for a year or more. When a company transitions from an entrepreneurial venture to a public company fit for outside ownership, how time is spent by strategic managers can be beneficial or detrimental. Time spent in meetings and drafting sessions related to an IPO can have a disastrous effect on the growth upon which the offering is predicated, and may even nullify it. In addition, during the many months it takes to put an IPO together, market conditions can deteriorate, making the completion of an IPO unfavorable. By contrast, a reverse takeover can be completed in as little as thirty days.
Reverse takeovers always come with some history, and some shareholders. Sometimes this history can be bad, and manifest itself in the form of currently sloppy records, pending lawsuits and other unforeseen liabilities. Additionally, these shells may sometimes come with angry or deceitful shareholders who are anxious to "dump" their stock at the first chance they get. One way the acquiring or surviving company can safeguard against the "dump" after the takeover is consummated, is by requiring a lock-up on the shares owned by the group they are purchasing the public shell from. Other shareholders that have held stock as investors in the company being acquired pose no threat in a dump scenario because the number of shares they hold is not significant and, unfortunately for them, they are likely to have the number of shares they own reduced by a reverse stock split that is not an uncommon part of a reverse takeover. Possibly the biggest caveat is that most CEO's are naive and inexperienced in the world of publicly traded companies, unless they have past experience as an officer or director of a public company.
A major disadvantage of going public via a reverse merger is that such transactions only introduce liquidity to a previously private stock if there is bona fide public interest in the company.
The greater number of financing options available to publicly held companies is a primary reason to undergo a reverse takeover. These financing options include:
In addition, the now-publicly held company obtains the benefits of public trading of its securities:
Process
In a reverse takeover, shareholders of the private company purchase control of the public shell company and then merge it with the private company. The publicly traded corporation is called a "shell" since all that exists of the original company is its organizational structure. The private company shareholders receive a substantial majority of the shares of the public company and control of its board of directors. The transaction can be accomplished within weeks. If the shell is an SEC-registered company, the private company does not go through an expensive and time-consuming review with state and federal regulators because this process was completed beforehand with the public company.
The transaction involves the private and shell company exchanging information on each other, negotiating the merger terms, and signing a share exchange agreement. At the closing, the shell company issues a substantial majority of its shares and board control to the shareholders of the private company. The private company's shareholders pay for the shell company by contributing their shares in the private company to the shell company that they now control. This share exchange and change of control completes the reverse takeover, transforming the formerly privately held company into a publicly held company.
[edit] Benefits
The advantages of public trading status include the possibility of commanding a higher price for a later offering of the company's securities. Going public through a reverse takeover allows a privately held company to become publicly held at a lesser cost, and with less stock dilution than through an initial public offering (IPO). While the process of going public and raising capital is combined in an IPO, in a reverse takeover, these two functions are separate. A company can go public without raising additional capital. Separating these two functions greatly simplifies the process.
In addition, a reverse takeover is less susceptible to market conditions. Conventional IPOs are risky for companies to undertake because the deal relies on market conditions, over which senior management has little control. If the market is off, the underwriter may pull the offering. The market also does not need to plunge wholesale. If a company in registration participates in an industry that's making unfavorable headlines, investors may shy away from the deal. In a reverse takeover, since the deal rests solely between those controlling the public and private companies, market conditions have little bearing on the situation.
The process for a conventional IPO can last for a year or more. When a company transitions from an entrepreneurial venture to a public company fit for outside ownership, how time is spent by strategic managers can be beneficial or detrimental. Time spent in meetings and drafting sessions related to an IPO can have a disastrous effect on the growth upon which the offering is predicated, and may even nullify it. In addition, during the many months it takes to put an IPO together, market conditions can deteriorate, making the completion of an IPO unfavorable. By contrast, a reverse takeover can be completed in as little as thirty days.
[edit] Drawbacks
Reverse takeovers always come with some history, and some shareholders. Sometimes this history can be bad, and manifest itself in the form of currently sloppy records, pending lawsuits and other unforeseen liabilities. Additionally, these shells may sometimes come with angry or deceitful shareholders who are anxious to "dump" their stock at the first chance they get. One way the acquiring or surviving company can safeguard against the "dump" after the takeover is consummated, is by requiring a lock-up on the shares owned by the group they are purchasing the public shell from. Other shareholders that have held stock as investors in the company being acquired pose no threat in a dump scenario because the number of shares they hold is not significant and, unfortunately for them, they are likely to have the number of shares they own reduced by a reverse stock split that is not an uncommon part of a reverse takeover. Possibly the biggest caveat is that most CEO's are naive and inexperienced in the world of publicly traded companies, unless they have past experience as an officer or director of a public company.
A major disadvantage of going public via a reverse merger is that such transactions only introduce liquidity to a previously private stock if there is bona fide public interest in the company.
[edit] Future financing
The greater number of financing options available to publicly held companies is a primary reason to undergo a reverse takeover. These financing options include:
- The issuance of additional stock in a secondary offering
- An exercise of warrants, where stockholders have the right to purchase additional shares in a company at predetermined prices. When many shareholders with warrants exercise their option to purchase additional shares, the company receives an infusion of capital.
- Other investors are more likely to invest in a company via a private offering of stock when a mechanism to sell their stock is in place should the company be successful.
In addition, the now-publicly held company obtains the benefits of public trading of its securities:
- Increased liquidity of company stock
- Higher company valuation due to a higher share price
- Greater access to capital markets
- Ability to acquire other companies through stock transactions
- Ability to use stock incentive plans to attract and retain employees
any sifu care to commemt on the RTO of Ezyhealth..? any one benefited from this deal? care to share share thk a million.hehehe.....
don"t know can copy or not......TRY clicking
Thks mr. hulumas was just reading it......will post it later.....it seem that company can issue unlimited share hor.......wah....unlisted company owner make tons of $......in this case.......small flies all kena diluted jelak..jelak.......but if hold until to date .....hehehe...also make alot lor.......
Hulumas ( Date: 26-Sep-2010 11:59) Posted:
|
Please refer to "WILMAR" as one of the case study, it might be helpful to all your asked questions.
lawcheemeng ( Date: 25-Sep-2010 14:31) Posted:
|
like to ask any sifu out there care give more info about RTO?(reverse take over)...how many ways are they?..how is it done? any example of a sucessful one. Does it dilute the exsisting share holder? thanks a million......a million thks...all contribution well come ....hehehe.......