
Latest Forum Topics / Straits Times Index |
![]() |
STI to cross 3000 boosted by long-term investors
|
|||||
krisluke
Supreme |
22-Feb-2011 02:23
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Oil industry braces for fallout from LibyaBy JANE WARDELL (AP:LONDON) Oil consuming nations have emergency reserves they can use to stabilize markets in case the violence in Libya and the wider Middle East escalates and crimps production, officials said Monday. |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
krisluke
Supreme |
22-Feb-2011 02:20
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Leading party hopes for better deal on bailoutBy ROBERT BARR (AP:DUBLIN) Ireland's next government wants to spread the pain from the nation's bank collapse to investors in bank bonds, an ambition that could be popular with hard-pressed taxpayers _ but disrupt the nation's bailout agreement and worsen Europe's debt crisis. |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|||||
krisluke
Supreme |
22-Feb-2011 02:18
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Oil jumps to above $90 as Libya protests spreadBy PABLO GORONDI Oil prices jumped by over $4 a barrel on Monday amid investor concerns that violent protests spreading in Libya could disrupt crude supplies from the OPEC nation and affect other oil-rich countries in the region. |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
krisluke
Supreme |
22-Feb-2011 01:58
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
WARNING: Obama’s $3.73 Trillion Budget Could Sink These Three ETFsRecent months have brought some indications that the storm clouds over the U.S. economy are beginning to clear. Manufacturing activity is picking up again, earnings reports have been generally impressive, and consumer spending and confidence have shown signs of a pulse. Though major indexes have reached (or nearly reached) pre-recession levels, there are still lingering concerns. Job creation–believed by many economists to be an indication of a sustainable recovery has been non-existent. And though we have ousted the sub-prime mortgage issues and strengthened our dollar to some extent, we are still left with one other major issue: debt–over $14 trillion of it to be precise. To put that in perspective, a stack of $100 dollar bills totaling $1 trillion would stand roughly 740 miles high, meaning our current debt stack would be roughly 10,360 miles tall [see also 11 Rapid Fire ETF Ideas For 2011]. The government deficit has rapidly increased over the past decade, and is quickly becoming the single biggest concern for investors and government officials alike. Now, President Barack Obama has released his budget plan for the fiscal year 2012. The plan will aim to spend $3.73 trillion throughout the course of the year, in an effort to lower our deficit over the next decade. The aim of the budget plan is to make heavy allocations in 2012, and cut spending across the board for the rest of the decade, slowly lowering our annual deficit as the years go on and eventually lowering the total by $1.1 trillion dollars. As with any budget proposal, the plan was met with heavy opposition, as the biggest critics criticized the report for lacking specifics on how exactly it will be implemented, as well as lofty growth projections [see also Three ETFs For Obama’s Public Works Plan]. Specific TargetsThe proposed plan will boost research on alternative energy such as solar and wind, while also increasing spending on education. A substantial portion of the budget will be focused on green technologies, and improving our air and water quality. “Mr. Obama’s budget would spend $584 million to support research and innovation into new and emerging environmental sciences, including a $24.7 million increase in grants tied to clean air and water,” write Janet Hook and Damian Paletta. The budget will also increase spending on Medicare and health services for veterans wounded in recent wars. But what will garner the most attention will be the tough cuts the government has proposed. This will come in the form of less spending on sectors such as defense, and slowly winding down wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Due to the massive size of the proposed budget, it will likely be a major mover for the market, and ETFs alike. Below, we outline three major budget cut proposals, and how they will directly impact ETFs in the future [see also Three ETFs To Own If Sarah Palin Is Right]. OilThe budget will bring higher taxes to oil and natural-gas companies through the elimination of “tax preferences”, and will also feature a $500 million investment “to restructure the federal agency that regulates offshore drilling” in response to last year’s Deepwater Horizon Spill. Higher taxes will lead to a squeeze in profits, and with offshore drilling regulations ramping up in the U.S., it may be difficult for many major oil firms to gain permits to drill and access oil vital to their revenue streams. SPDR S& P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Fund (XOP): This ETF tracks an index which represents the oil and gas exploration and production sub-industry portion of the S& P Total Markets Index. The all-U.S. fund is home to many big names in oil/gas exploration, such as Chesapeake Energy (3.1%), Devon Energy (2.9%), and Valero Energy (2.8%). The fund invests in approximately 38 securities which focus on the medium and large cap sectors of the market. XOP is up over 10% in 2011, but it may see a major hit if the tax breaks for oil firms are eliminated and offshore drilling requirements are steepened [see also QE2 Slaughters Long-Term Treasury ETFs]. WaterThough Obama plans on improving water quality, (with $24.7 million increase in grants tied to researching clean water solutions) his budget will trim nearly $1 billion from the the Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Water and Drinking Water State Revolving Funds, a 27% cut from 2010 levels. These funds subsidized both state and local water/sewage project, and cutting these subsidies could lead to higher water prices for consumers. A lack of subsidies will also take away incentives for new water infrastructure, and could create a major bottleneck in the industry [see also Inflation-Fighting ETFs Back In Focus]. PowerShares Water Resource Portfolio Fund (PHO): This fund measures an index that consists of companies that focus on the provision of potable water, the treatment of water, and the technology and services that are directly related to water consumption. The fund holds nearly all of its assets in U.S.-based firms, the majority of which are either small or medium cap companies. Investors in this ETF should carefully monitor what happens to government subsidies in the water sector, as they will directly weigh on this fund. Specifically, investors need to pay attention to any proposals which could make it more difficult for local areas to raise the necessary capital to improve their water related infrastructure, as many of the components of PHO thrive on these types of projects. BiotechAnother proposal in the budget would “hasten the availability of generic biologic drugs by reducing the market exclusivity period for brand biologics to seven years from 12 years” notes Brent Kendall. Kendall goes on to point out that biologic drugs are differ from traditional drugs in that  “biologic drugs are complex and expensive medicines derived from proteins manufactured in living cells. Traditional drugs are made by mixing chemicals”. Along with a decrease in patent life, another proposal would eliminate controversial settlements where brand-name pharma firms pay generic competitors to halt patent challenges. This combination could prove deadly for biotech ETFs, as patent lives may be drastically reduced, and competition will ramp up on numerous drugs, potentially slashing profits for many firms [Try our free stock exposure tool here]. iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology Fund (IBB): IBB seeks to replicate the performance of the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index, which contains NASDAQ listed companies classified as either biotechnology or pharmaceuticals companies. Major holdings in this ETF include Gilead Sciences (5.1%), Alexion Pharmaceuticals (3.8%), and Genzyme Corporation (3.2%). With the fund holding roughly 90% of its assets in U.S. firms, Obama’s budget could have significant consequences for the biotech companies that make up this ETF. A shorter patent life and the end of patent settlements could sink these companies and ETF alike, potentially marking a tough road ahead for these companies should President Obama’s budget pass with this stipulation intact. |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
FayeFangKaew
Member |
22-Feb-2011 01:54
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
I find it hard to  imagine if none of the protestors invest in stocks in their own country ....
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|||||
krisluke
Supreme |
22-Feb-2011 01:52
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Nomura On " The Irish Question" And What's At Stake In Friday's Huge ElectionThis past week emergency overnight borrowing at the ECB surged to record highs, and it was learned that it was Irish banks were at the trough.
Ireland, after a period of calm, is clearly back at the fore, and big elections set for this Friday should mean that Ireland will dominate the news all week. The election is crucial since the opposition parties -- which are likely to dominate -- are not so keen on the IMF bailout/austerity deal agreed to by the current ruling Fianna Fail party. Nomura's Dimitris Drakopoulos and Peter Westaway size up what's at stake in their note on " The Irish Question." With a general election to be held on 25 February, there has been uncertainty on the likely winners’ intentions on renegotiating the EU/IMF packages and in particular on the possibility of haircuts to the debt of Irish banks. Based on current opinion polls, the main opposition party, Fine Gael looks set to overhaul the ruling Fianna Fail party and hold the balance of power, probably in coalition with the Labour party. Fine Gael and Fianna Fail are committed to the ongoing austerity measures, with nuanced differences (by contrast, Sinn Fein is opposed to IMF/EU austerity measures but, despite market worries, we believe it is unlikely to gain any influence). But Fine Gael has made it clear (as explained in its manifesto) that it wishes to renegotiate the terms of the loans from the IMF/EU. Among other things, it wants the European Financial Stability Fund (EFSF) to buy debt and equity in AIB and Bank of Ireland it also wants the US regulators to allow it to secure funding of up to $50bn from the Federal Reserve using the dollar assets of Irish banks and more interestingly it wants Ireland to be allowed to buy “insurance” from the EU against further losses in its banks. Without a renegotiation along these lines, Fine Gael has warned that it will unilaterally restructure the debt of Irish banks in greatest need of recapitalisation. The Labour party, a potential coalition partner, is also arguing for such haircuts (as well as for less aggressive austerity measures). In its most recent statements, Fine Gael’s rhetoric has been slightly more nuanced, saying it will impose losses only on senior bondholders as part of a Europe-wide framework. Even so, this uncertainty about what lies in wait after the general election has undermined confidence in the Irish banking sector. CDS spreads have remained elevated and Irish bank deposits have continued to flow out. December data showed that there was a €35bn (21%) month-on-month decline in non-resident deposits, which followed outflows of €20bn in November and €10bn in October. Irish resident deposits also declined by €5bn in December and €6bn in November. To boot, the explicit discussions on senior defaults by the government and opposition statements led Moody's and Fitch to cut the rating of unguaranteed senior unsecured bank debt in the last two weeks, reducing further the ECB eligible collateral of Irish banks. The analysts also take a look at the matter of haircuts, and one powerful point they make is that ultimately haircuts for bond holders would have little impact on the sovereign's overall debt sustainability (conspiracy theorists might note that OF COURSE someone writing from a bank would be a opposted to haircuts). There would be no significant gains in terms of debt sustainability. As we argued, the amount of outstanding unsecured senior debt in unviable institutions is small. The debt reductioneven with a 40% haircut would not bring any considerable gains in terms of debt sustainability. We project the debt dynamics to remain unfavourable until at least 2015 (see Figure 1). The main negative contributions come from the primary deficit (12.6% of GDP on the debt ratio in 2011-14), which might take until 2015 to return to surplus from around -9% in 2010 and an unfavourable interest rate growth differential (contributing around 7% of GDP). show the challenge ahead: under our baseline scenario if Ireland returns to its 2011 debt to GDP of 113% by 2020 it would have to run primary surpluses of at least 3% of GDP after 2015.
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
krisluke
Supreme |
22-Feb-2011 01:46
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Libyan Protesters Take Control Of Several Cities, Oil Companies Remove Workers, And Gaddafi Faces Mass Defections ![]() The latest from Libya isn't pretty for Gaddafi:
  According to GulfNews editor Abdul Hamid Ahmad, Libyan protesters have now taken control of several Libyan cities, thanks to defections by by the military. Clearly, if you thought Mubarak had a loyalty problem, Gaddafi's is much worse. There are reportss of defections not just at the military, but among various government workers, including diplomats at the embassy level. Meanwhile, international oil companies are jetting out of town. BP has stopped exploration and ENI has pulled familiy members of workers, Brent crude in London has hit $105. We appear to be the last days of the Gaddafi regime. |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
teeth53
Supreme |
22-Feb-2011 00:42
![]() Yells: "don't learn through life, learn to grow with life " |
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Why ??. We just cannot pretend nothing happen on d others side. :(. A lesson all have to note, we can learn from here.) Too much for negative news!
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|||||
teeth53
Supreme |
22-Feb-2011 00:36
![]() Yells: "don't learn through life, learn to grow with life " |
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
We just cannot pretend nothing happen on d others side. :(. A lesson all have to note, we can learn from here.) Too much for negative news!
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
parkings
Member |
22-Feb-2011 00:16
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
well,  using fibonaci, hope i get the spelling rite, sti should correct to around 2800 before it can cheong more.  Cos it cheong so much and the resting period is not long or deep enough for it to cheong higher.  Think of it, it cheong for 9 months, now only 1 -2 months of corrrection only | ||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
krisluke
Supreme |
21-Feb-2011 23:23
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
what the F *C* !!! DJ fut -60 points.  ![]() |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
krisluke
Supreme |
21-Feb-2011 23:15
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
The Federal Reserve The Federal Reserve (Fed), which is headed by a government agency in Washington known as the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, is widely considered to be one of the most important Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) are state-owned funds composing of financial assets such as equities, bonds, property or other financial instruments. Prominent SWFs include Abu Dhabi investment Authority, Government of Singapore Investment Corporation and China Investment Corporation. Catalists Catalist, the transformed SESDAQ, is Singapore Exchange’s new sponsor-supervised listing platform for fast growing local and international companies.
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
|
|||||
krisluke
Supreme |
21-Feb-2011 23:10
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
FTSE ST Index Series
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
krisluke
Supreme |
21-Feb-2011 23:07
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Short-selling
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
krisluke
Supreme |
21-Feb-2011 22:57
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
London Bridge Is Falling Down – A Look At Eurozone’s Debt Issues
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
krisluke
Supreme |
21-Feb-2011 22:43
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
why? |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
warrenbegger
Elite |
21-Feb-2011 22:41
![]() Yells: "Anyhow Buy Anyhow Die ^_^" |
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Lucky i closed all position/profit taking/cut lost last friday. Market sentiment and STI getting worse and worse each day till i go watch Topix/Nikkei porn porn better. Dont know when all this rubbish/shit/wet sai last and dont know how bad it can be, so the best safe bet for me is to out of market for a while and waiting for market recovery. At least now i can sleep well, suck thumb and wet dream well without any ejection difficulty. Many govt now like to gang rape/target/kill lock property and contruction sector so it also better to stay away if u can, dont know how long they will rape them? Wish those still in market can survive this china intrested rape and those rubbish gone case riot at so many place. As u can now see everday bad news is 90% more than good news and even 10% good news given to STI also no use, cause STI now had lose it manhood (banana spoil liao). I be back! cya and kiss kiss all :) | ||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
teeth53
Supreme |
21-Feb-2011 21:23
![]() Yells: "don't learn through life, learn to grow with life " |
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Thing to look out for......Elsewhere in creating havoc, Hang Seng is down, that has revived worries about inflation and higher interest rates.   " I think this region concerned by high inflation, which is a killer for market valuation," said Pichai Lertsupongkij at broker Thanachart Securities. " Overall, this region is still in a downward direction with flows still favouring developed markets," he said. Singapore's main index ended down 0.5 percent in a range-bound session, similar to others in the region.
|
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
krisluke
Supreme |
21-Feb-2011 20:37
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
The Federal Reserve's Quantitative Easing Is Raising Inflation Expectation
I wrote this paragraph one month before the Federal Reserve announced its second program of quantitative easing. I want to be clear that this program has no direct effect on the real economy as banks are not reserve constrained adding reserves via quantitative easing does not increase the amount of loanable funds available for creditworthy borrowers. Rather, banks make the loans first and then worry about the reserve requirement afterwards, borrowing reserves in the inter-bank market if necessary. The only way that QE affects the economy is through its psychological impact in changing private portfolio preferences because of expected low rates followed by expected future inflation and the resultant policy tightening. It works like this:
So, if the Fed signals that it is prepared to keep rates low today despite rising inflation, interest rate expectations will shift downwards for the near-term, but inflation and interest rate expectations will shift upwards further out in the future. Future rate hikes will be seen as likely and market participants will shift their private portfolio preferences accordingly, steepening the yield curve. That’s how the so called bond vigilantes work in a reflationary environment. That’s what’s happening right now – and generally speaking, it’s good for stocks, neutral for short-duration bonds and negative for long-duration bonds. Here’s how Jim Bianco put it in a post at Barry Ritholtz’s site:
Get it? " [N]one of the rise in yields since August has come from higher real rates." It’s all about increased expected inflation. See my post " Gross: Central Banks are Robbing Bond Holders and Fuelling Inflation" for a review of what US government bond holders think of this policy. The real question is whether the inflation that bondholders are expecting will actually lead to rate rises. Bond vigilantes can sell Treasuries in expectation of future rate hikes. (Remember, long rates are simply a chain of expected future short rates.) However, if the Fed remains on easy street for an extended period, what I call permanent zero, then eventually the vigilantes are going to have to say uncle. This is the tug of war now going on. You have serious asset and commodity price inflation that has begun to feed through into consumer price inflation – first in food and soon across the board. Central bankers like Ben Bernanke and Mervyn King are telling us this will pass. If it doesn’t, then they will be forced to either hike rates or accept stagflation. The bond market vigilantes are selling bonds in expectation that the central banks will hike. Who wins this battle? |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||||
krisluke
Supreme |
21-Feb-2011 20:32
|
||||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Chinese Inflation, Monetary Policy, And The Dollars Peg By J James Reade, Lecturer, Department of Economics, University of Birmingham, and Ulrich Volz, Senior Economist at the German Development Institute
The sixteen articlesThe central bank’s struggle to combat inflation with market-based monetary policy tools has been highlighted recently when the State Council issued a set of new policy documents (“the Sixteen Articles”) outlining China’s new inflation-fighting strategy. As pointed out by Huang (2010), the Sixteen Articles don’t mention the term “monetary policy” at all. Instead, the strategy lists a host of administrative inflation-fighting measures at the micro level, ranging from a better management of farms for winter grains and oils to better cotton transportation in Xinjiang (Huang 2010). So far, the reliance on monetary tools and administrative measures that emphasise the amount rather than the price of credit has had at least one advantage. It has helped China to largely insulate its monetary policy from international monetary movements (Reade and Volz 2010). While the maintenance of capital controls has certainly helped in this (Ma and McCauley 2007), arguably, it would have been much more difficult for the central bank to exert relatively autonomous monetary policy in the face of the dollar peg had it relied on a predominantly interest rate-based monetary policy. But even though the dominance of administrative tools in monetary policymaking has provided some policy space and diminished pressure on the central bank to adjust its interest rates to US monetary policy, it has come to the detriment of a development of Chinese financial markets and a more efficient allocation of capital. Indeed, negative real interest rates and a lack of attractive alternative investment opportunities in Chinese financial markets have helped fuel bubbles in the property and stock markets. Overall, China’s monetary policy mix has worked reasonably well thus far – after all, the average inflation rate has been just 3.4% over the past four years in the face of average real GDP growth of 10.8%. Nevertheless, with rising inflationary pressure from abundant international liquidity, it will become increasingly difficult to contain inflation with a monetary framework centred on administrative measures rather than price-based policies. With negative real interest rates for deposits and growing asset and property bubbles, the time is certainly ripe for further monetary tightening in China. Instead of focusing on micro-management of the economy, as put forward in the Sixteen Articles that outline China’s new inflation-fighting strategy, the government should grant the central bank the room for further reform of its monetary policy approach. To make more efficient use of the interest rate instrument, this will also require a further loosening of the dollar peg. ReferencesFinancial Times (2010a), “China Inflation Surges to 25-month High”, Financial Times, 11 November. Financial Times (2010b), “China: What Didn’t Happen”, Financial Times, 28 Financial Times (2011a): “PMI Data Raise Fears Over Inflation in Asia”, Financial Times, 1 February. Financial Times (2011b), “China in Fresh Interest Rate Rise”, Financial Times, 9 February. Financial Times (2011c), “China Steps up Fight Against Inflation”, Financial Times, 14 January. Huang, Yiping (2010), “A Good Example of Dealing with Macro Problems Using Micro Tools”, VoxEU.org, 27 November. Koivu, T (2009), “Has the Chinese Economy Become More Sensitive to Interest Rates? Studying Credit Demand in China”, China Economic Review, 20(3):455-470. Ma, G and RN McCauley (2007), “Do China’s Capital Controls Still Bind? Implications for Monetary Autonomy and Capital Liberalization”, Working Paper 233, Bank for International Settlements, Basel. Reade, JJ and U Volz (2010), “Chinese Monetary Policy and the Dollar Peg”, School of Business & Economics Discussion Paper 2010/35, Freie Universität Berlin. This post originally appeared at VoxEU.org. |
||||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me |