Latest Forum Topics / User Research/Opinions |
![]() |
#### AFFORDABILITY ? ? ? ?
|
|||
pharoah88
Supreme |
05-Dec-2010 14:09
|
||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
ACCIDENTAL GROWTH has INHERENT DAMAGING EFFECTS which are DISruptive to the citizens ? ? ? ? And no beneficial accruals at all ? ? ? ? |
||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
pharoah88
Supreme |
05-Dec-2010 13:42
|
||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
别把高增长当美景 (2010-12-05) 就势论市 我们不希望经济增长是在社会矛盾和冲突加剧下取得,而最终让国家和社会付出高昂的代价。 以高成本为代价换取经济增长,只会引来社会不稳定因素,唯有能照顾到人的需要、社会发展的需要才是永续的增长。 新加坡今年的经济增长应该会在最后预测的高端——15%,即使明年的增长率会是刚宣布的介于4%至6%,也很可能会像今年三次上调一样,一再作出调高修正。 …… |
||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
|
|||
pharoah88
Supreme |
04-Dec-2010 16:53
|
||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Get residents involved in upgrading decisions Letter from Lim Poh Seng I REFER to the report “Six older private estates to be upgraded” (Dec 3). I believe residents living in private estates should also be given the opportunity to take part in the decisionmaking process when it comes to upgrading. Residents in Housing and Development Board estates have been involved in decision-making in estate and lift upgrading programmes. Those living in condominiums are also involved in en-bloc sale decisions. Thus, residents would then realise the importance of their vote. The Thomson Ridge Estate management invites residents to post ideas and comments on the upgrading on its website. This is something which I think could be duplicated in many parts of Singapore. If people in charge of private estates or condominiums could set up websites for their residents, it would make it easier for more residents to be involved in making decisions and making their estates a better place. First, a survey could be carried out to note what upgrading needs to be done for the estate. Those who do not have access to the Internet could still be allowed to submit their ideas on paper. The findings can then be published on the estate website, together with the cost that could be incurred for each upgrading. Quite often residents are not consulted about many simple matters. With voting on the website, even the playground equipment and exercise machines favoured by residents can be decided democratically, instead of being given a piece-meal playground with the residents not in favour of the equipment. |
||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
pharoah88
Supreme |
02-Dec-2010 09:48
|
||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Letter from Lim Yuin Chien Press Secretary to the Minister for National Development I REFER to the letter “It’s a question of supply” (Nov 24), where the Reform Party’s Hazel Poa questioned the use of two internationally accepted measures — the housing-price-to-income ratio (HPI) and debt-serviceratio (DSR) — to assess housing affordability. First, the Reform Party rejects the two measures because they contradict the party’s assertion that flats are out of reach for most Singaporeans. What other objective and widely used measures of affordability does the Reform Party propose? Second, Ms Poa questioned the affordability of HDB flats. The primary basis to assess affordability should be new and not resale flats. HDB offers new flats every year, priced at a discount to comparable resale flat prices. HDB is building more new flats than before, in a variety of sizes and locations to meet demand from households with different budgets. As for resale flat prices, Ms Poa argued that they had increased faster than incomes from 1990 to 2009. But why 1990? There was a steep jump in resale flat prices in 1993, when HDB began offering loans based on market valuation. If we consider other reasonably long time periods after 1993, like 1995 to 2009 or 2000 to 2009, housing prices have in fact moved in step with incomes. Ms Poa has also ignored the CPF Housing Grant and Additional Housing Grant, which make resale flats more affordable to first-timers, especially applicants with lower incomes. The Reform Party has suggested controlling resale flat prices. An HDB flat is a home and asset belonging to citizens, who hope that its value will appreciate with the country’s growth. As such, resale prices move based on market forces, while the Government keeps watch for excessive exuberance. Resale prices have appreciated over the years because Singapore has prospered, infrastructure has been improved, and flats have been regularly upgraded along with their surroundings. If instead the economy were to decline, jobs were lost, or housing estates allowed to run down, flat prices would surely fall. The Reform Party’s formula to control resale flat prices would make them worth far less than their value today. How would this benefit the many hundreds of thousands of existing homeowners? Third, Ms Poa criticised the DSR because it only measures affordability for people who buy flats. But in Singapore today, eight in 10 Singaporeans have bought and live in HDB flats, with over 90 per cent owning their flats. On average, 15,000 first-timers buy HDB flats and join the ranks of homeowners every year. This high ownership rate is the best proof that HDB flats are affordable. Today, young couples in Singapore can reasonably aspire to buy a new BTO flat after working for about two years. No other major city or country does this for its young people.
|
||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me | |||
pharoah88
Supreme |
02-Dec-2010 09:37
|
||
x 0
x 0 Alert Admin |
Understanding the
|
||
Useful To Me Not Useful To Me |