ShareJunction - Member Posts

Back

Latest Posts By pharoah88 - Supreme

About pharoah88

First < Newer 6781-6800 of 13894 Older> Last

13-Sep-2010 14:29

Genting HK USD / Genting HK US$

Go to Message

x 0

14:27:50 0.480 50,000 Bought From Seller

26:36 0.475 2,509,000 Bought From Seller

14:18:12 0.475 1,366,000 Bought From Seller

14:16:30 0.475 1,297,000 Bought From Seller

14:12:56 0.470 2,000,000 Bought From Seller

14:04:23 0.470 1,000,000 Bought From Seller

14:04:11 0.470 15,000 Bought From Seller

14:04:10 0.470 3,000 Bought From Seller

14:04:10 0.470 10,000 Bought From Seller

14:04:08 0.470 200,000 Bought From Seller

14:04:06 0.470 5,000 Bought From Seller

14:04:04 0.470 5,000 Bought From Seller

14:04:04 0.470 100,000 Bought From Seller

14:04:03 0.470 254,000 Bought From Seller

14:04:02 0.470 851,000 Bought From Seller

14:02:32 0.465 1,020,000 Bought From Seller

14:02:31 0.465 470,000 Bought From Seller

14:02:31 0.465 10,000 Bought From Seller

14:02:30 0.465 210,000 Bought From Seller

14:02:29 0.465 450,000 Bought From Seller

14:02:28 0.465 30,000 Bought From Seller

14:02:28 0.465 1,050,000 Bought From Seller

14:00:40 0.460 6,268,000 Bought From Seller

14:00:40 0.460 8,000,000 Bought From Seller

pharoah88 ( Date: 13-Sep-2010 11:49) Posted:

11:28:10 0.455 1,000,000 Bought From Seller

11:07:51 0.455 2,000,000 Bought From Seller

11:01:40 0.455 1,500,000 Bought From Seller

11:01:39 0.455 50,000 Bought From Seller

11:01:38 0.455 1,000,000 Bought From Seller

10:57:21 0.455 1,000,000 Bought From Seller

10:57:16 0.455 1,657,000 Bought From Seller

10:55:55 0.450 11,827,000 Bought From Seller

pharoah88 ( Date: 13-Sep-2010 10:15) Posted:

10:13:52

0.450

1,000,000

Bought From Seller

Good Post Bad Post

13-Sep-2010 14:16

Genting Sing / GenSp starts to move up again

Go to Message

x 0

Did authorities not know about shuttles?

Was there an inter-agencybreakdown?

Letter from M Lukshumayeh

I REFER to “Regulator puts immediate brake on IR shuttles” (Sept 11).

It is good that the relevant authorities acted on the free shuttle buses to the IRs with immediate directives. Despite there being some debate on whether these buses lured gamblers to the casino, it cannot be disputed that it would certainly entice some gamblers from the heartlands.

The shuttle bus services had been in operation for a while and surely, relevant approvals must have been sought from Government agencies by the transport operators and approvals duly given — but perhaps not with the involvement of the Casino Regulatory Authority (CRA).

This incident perhaps highlights the need for greater inter-Government agency engagement and interaction on certain matters, such as the approval for bus operations to and from the integrated resorts.

In this case, it appears that CRA was not aware of the shuttle bus operations. If this is so, it is perhaps through no fault of their own now that the shuttle bus operators and their employees find themselves in an awful bind.

Do more to curb ‘incentives’

Letter from Chua Hin Bee

FREE bus services between RWS and HDB heartland areas began operation a few months ago. However, it is astonishing to learn that instead of stepping in from day one, the authority only acted recently after receiving complaints from the public.

It is stated that the IR operators are not allowed to provide incentives in any form for Singaporeans to patronise the casinos.

What about other possible incentives such as a personal chauffeur service, discounted or even free dining and hotel accommodation, shopping vouchers and extra gambling chips?

Regular patrons may even receive VIP privileges for overseas casinos run by the same operator. Are such incentives permitted by the authority? If not, what measures will it take to ensure the IR operators abide by the rules?

Give us some notice

Letter from William Tay

THE abrupt cessation of shuttle services to both IRs on Friday seemed like overkill by the CRA. Was this a life-and-death situation warranting such a drastic action?

Many elderly and children visiting the IRs were left stranded when the shuttle was abruptly cancelled. At least 24 hours’ notice should have been given.

Bar gamblers without stopping service

Letter from Peter Lim

THE CRA should not stop the IR-heartland shuttles without considering other alternatives.

I would suggest that the free shuttles be resumed with the condition that passengers get an ink-stamp on their hands. Casino staff should be directed not to allow entry to visitors bearing the stamp.

This would address the concerns about the shuttle service encouraging gambling, while still making available the convenience of this shuttle service to those who just want to visit the IR without gambling.

Good Post Bad Post

13-Sep-2010 14:04

User Research/Opinions / <*> Free And Free <*><*><*> Pay And Pay <*>

Go to Message

x 0

####Bar gamblers without stopping service#### <<>> THE CRA should not stop the IR-heartland shuttles without considering other alternatives. I would suggest that the free shuttles be resumed with the condition that passengers get an ink-stamp on their hands. Casino staff should be directed not to allow entry to visitors bearing the stamp. This would address the concerns about the shuttle service encouraging gambling, while still making available the convenience of this shuttle service to those who just want to visit the IR without gambling.

Good Post Bad Post

13-Sep-2010 14:00

User Research/Opinions / <*> Free And Free <*><*><*> Pay And Pay <*>

Go to Message

x 0

####Give us some notice#### <<>> THE abrupt cessation of shuttle services to both IRs on Friday seemed like overkill by the CRA. Was this a life-and-death situation warranting such a drastic action? Many elderly and children visiting the IRs were left stranded when the shuttle was abruptly cancelled. At least 24 hours’ notice should have been given.

Good Post Bad Post

13-Sep-2010 13:55

User Research/Opinions / <*> Free And Free <*><*><*> Pay And Pay <*>

Go to Message

x 0

####Do more to curb ‘incentives’#### <<>> FREE bus services between RWS and HDB heartland areas began operation a few months ago. However, it is astonishing to learn that instead of stepping in from day one, the authority only acted recently after receiving complaints from the public. It is stated that the IR operators are not allowed to provide incentives in any form for Singaporeans to patronise the casinos. What about other possible incentives such as a personal chauffeur service, discounted or even free dining and hotel accommodation, shopping vouchers and extra gambling chips? Regular patrons may even receive VIP privileges for overseas casinos run by the same operator. Are such incentives permitted by the authority? If not, what measures will it take to ensure the IR operators abide by the rules?

Good Post Bad Post

13-Sep-2010 13:51

User Research/Opinions / <*> Free And Free <*><*><*> Pay And Pay <*>

Go to Message

x 0

***Did authorities not know about shuttles?*** ####Was there an inter-agency breakdown?#### <<>> I REFER to “Regulator puts immediate brake on IR shuttles” (Sept 11). It is good that the relevant authorities acted on the free shuttle buses to the IRs with immediate directives. Despite there being some debate on whether these buses lured gamblers to the casino, it cannot be disputed that it would certainly entice some gamblers from the heartlands. The shuttle bus services had been in operation for a while and surely, relevant approvals must have been sought from Government agencies by the transport operators and approvals duly given — but perhaps not with the involvement of the Casino Regulatory Authority (CRA). This incident perhaps highlights the need for greater inter-Government agency engagement and interaction on certain matters, such as the approval for bus operations to and from the integrated resorts. In this case, it appears that CRA was not aware of the shuttle bus operations. If this is so, it is perhaps through no fault of their own now that the shuttle bus operators and their employees find themselves in an awful bind.

Good Post Bad Post

13-Sep-2010 13:47

User Research/Opinions / ~~~~ CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ~~~~

Go to Message

x 0

#### Did authorities not know about shuttles? #### Was there an inter-agency breakdown? I REFER to “Regulator puts immediate brake on IR shuttles” (Sept 11). It is good that the relevant authorities acted on the free shuttle buses to the IRs with immediate directives. Despite there being some debate on whether these buses lured gamblers to the casino, it cannot be disputed that it would certainly entice some gamblers from the heartlands. The shuttle bus services had been in operation for a while and surely, relevant approvals must have been sought from Government agencies by the transport operators and approvals duly given — but perhaps not with the involvement of the Casino Regulatory Authority (CRA). This incident perhaps highlights the need for greater inter-Government agency engagement and interaction on certain matters, such as the approval for bus operations to and from the integrated resorts. In this case, it appears that CRA was not aware of the shuttle bus operations. If this is so, it is perhaps through no fault of their own now that the shuttle bus operators and their employees find themselves in an awful bind. #### Do more to curb ‘incentives’ #### FREE bus services between RWS and HDB heartland areas began operation a few months ago. However, it is astonishing to learn that instead of stepping in from day one, the authority only acted recently after receiving complaints from the public. It is stated that the IR operators are not allowed to provide incentives in any form for Singaporeans to patronise the casinos. What about other possible incentives such as a personal chauffeur service, discounted or even free dining and hotel accommodation, shopping vouchers and extra gambling chips? Regular patrons may even receive VIP privileges for overseas casinos run by the same operator. Are such incentives permitted by the authority? If not, what measures will it take to ensure the IR operators abide by the rules? #### Give us some notice #### THE abrupt cessation of shuttle services to both IRs on Friday seemed like overkill by the CRA. Was this a life-and-death situation warranting such a drastic action? Many elderly and children visiting the IRs were left stranded when the shuttle was abruptly cancelled. At least 24 hours’ notice should have been given. Bar gamblers without stopping service Letter from Peter Lim THE CRA should not stop the IR-heartland shuttles without considering other alternatives. I would suggest that the free shuttles be resumed with the condition that passengers get an ink-stamp on their hands. Casino staff should be directed not to allow entry to visitors bearing the stamp. This would address the concerns about the shuttle service encouraging gambling, while still making available the convenience of this shuttle service to those who just want to visit the IR without gambling.

Good Post Bad Post

13-Sep-2010 13:02

Others / Life has to go on, says MM Lee

Go to Message

x 0

DETACHMENT !

wIth mOre wIves and mOre chIldren ?

each attachment becomes ?

fractIOnal and sUbstItUtable ?

especially wIth affaIrs and qUIckIes ?

lIke tIger wOOds ?

niuyear ( Date: 13-Sep-2010 12:39) Posted:

Though family come first, BUT, do not 'overly' love someone (include family members or life partners) . Parents love their kids so much so that they are badly trumatised when something happens to the kids... Same goes to the spouses.

Take the kids and spouses as companions and not to the extend of " he dies, i must go with him."

There is this mother who has only 1 son, and when the son has girl friend and planning to get married, the mother kind of sunk into depression and refused to give blessings to the son and his wife-to-be...later on , more things piled on and she committed suicide.

Good Post Bad Post

13-Sep-2010 12:57

Others / Life has to go on, says MM Lee

Go to Message

x 0

behInd every sUccessfUl man

there Is a sacred wOman

at sUch tIme the man shOUld enDEAR

ALL hIs tIme wIth her

tO thank her by her sIde

fOr ALL her suppOrt and sacrIfIces

nOthIng Is mOre ImpOrtant than

spendIng the REST Of tIme tOgether

travellIng Overseas is UNImpOrtant at ALL ? ? ? ?

Good Post Bad Post

13-Sep-2010 12:44

Straits Times Index / STI to cross 3000 boosted by long-term investors

Go to Message

x 0