/> ShareJunction - Member Posts
logo transparent gif
top_white_spacer
Home Latest Stock Forum Topics MyCorner - Personal Stocks Porfolio Stock Lists Investor Insights Investor Research & Links Dynamic Stock Charting FREE Registration About Us top spacer top spacer
 User Password Auto-Login
Enter Stock
 
righttip
branding

Back

Latest Posts By pharoah88 - Supreme      About pharoah88
First   < Newer   2661-2680 of 13894   Older>   Last  

14-Apr-2011 10:58 User Research/Opinions   /   your biggest worries?       Go to Message
x 0
x 0

Is there a right place to light-up?

Smoke-free HDB blocks

Letter from Joseph Eng

I would like to add on the letter from Lim Teck Koon, “A smoke-free plea” (April 13).

I urge the HDB to set aside smoke-free blocks.

As a HDB dweller, my family of non-smokers has to constantly put up with second-hand smoke from my neighbours. I am especially concerned for the health of my child who has suffered from this situation which is beyond our control — we cannot control the wind direction.

I am not against smokers lighting up in their homes as long as their puffs of smoke do not enter my premises. As it would be far-fetched to asked for a blanket ban on smoking at home, I urge the authorities to take alternative action on handling second-hand smoke.

Will there be ‘smokers’ paths’?

Letter from Jason Tan

Mr LIM Teck Koon is suggesting we prohibit smoking at traffic and pedestrian crossings, and he also mentions smokers lighting up along footpaths shared with non-smokers.

Right now, areas such as bus stops, taxi stands and within 5m of a building entrance are already off-limits to smokers.

If smoking is also banned on all footpaths, then where do smokers have to walk if they are heading to the MRT station or bus stop?

It seems that Mr Lim is a health-conscious person, which is a good thing.

May I ask if he wears a mask when he leaves home since, while waiting at the traffic junction, there are other harmful pollutants like carbon monoxide emitted by vehicles?

Good Post  Bad Post 
14-Apr-2011 10:54 User Research/Opinions   /   your biggest worries?       Go to Message
x 0
x 0


Republic back on top 10 list of priciest office locations

BAD for business ? ? ? ?

BAD for tenants ? ? ? ?

BAD for consumers ? ? ? ?

BAD for citizens ? ? ? ?

BAD for COST of LIVING ? ? ? ?

JUST  BAD

B A D
Good Post  Bad Post 
14-Apr-2011 10:50 User Research/Opinions   /   your biggest worries?       Go to Message
x 0
x 0

In summing up, Ms Lim echoed Deputy Prime Minister Wong Kan Seng’s call on voters to study the WP’s alternative programmes.

“We welcome scrutiny and we welcome scrutiny by Singaporeans too.

Because we believe in transparency and we want to tell people we are a serious party.

Good Post  Bad Post 
14-Apr-2011 10:48 User Research/Opinions   /   your biggest worries?       Go to Message
x 0
x 0

Mr Lee said the preference given to PAP wards represented an incentive to vote for the ruling party. But Ms Lim said: “We still think it’s immoral.

If they want to incentivise voters, they can use PAP funds, not public funds.”

Good Post  Bad Post 
14-Apr-2011 10:44 User Research/Opinions   /   your biggest worries?       Go to Message
x 0
x 0

The WP had launched its manifesto on Saturday, with transport one of the 15 broad areas the party sought to cover.

Apart from its proposal for a National Transport Corporation to avoid unnecessary duplication of services and cost overheads incurred by multiple operatorssaid the Public Transport Council should be dissolved., the WP had

#An INVERVETED ORGANIZATION Multi-Level-Management PYRAMID ? ? ? ?#

#TOO  MANY GENERALS  AT  TOP    TOO  FEW  SOLDIERS AT THE BOTTOMS ? ? ? ?#

TOPSY TURVY ? ? ? ?

Good Post  Bad Post 
14-Apr-2011 10:34 User Research/Opinions   /   your biggest worries?       Go to Message
x 0
x 0

In reply, Ms Lim said: “We’re proposing a national transportation corporation which will be run on cost recovery. So we’re not setting out to make it a loss-making enterprise in that sense.”

# COST based Contracting is the World famOUs SHELL SYSTEM of long term FAIR Deal with its suppliers and contractors ? ? ? ? #  WIN-WIN SOLUTION ? ? ? ?

# HIGH TRANSPORT COST is another DOMESTIC   INFLATION DEVIL ? ? ? ? #

Good Post  Bad Post 
14-Apr-2011 10:28 User Research/Opinions   /   your biggest worries?       Go to Message
x 0
x 0

“We’re all in favour of ground-up leadership that arises organically,” she said.

# This system does not need  to depend on GRC  and RE-boundarying for  success  ? ? ? ? #

Similarly,  every Village Chief  must stay in the incumbent Village with committed interest ? ? ? ?  How can a Chief does not like to stay in own managed village ? ? ? ?

“The residents in their own areas, to elect their own leaders — we feel that is a much better system in terms of having citizen activism ... rather than having a top-down structure that has become very politicised.

It’s much better for people to feel empowered.”

Good Post  Bad Post 
14-Apr-2011 10:14 User Research/Opinions   /   your biggest worries?       Go to Message
x 0
x 0

Yesterday, on behalf of the party, its chairman Sylvia Lim rebutted their criticism even as she welcomed their call for voters to scrutinise the 220 proposals in its 63-page document.

CHECK  them  OUT ? ? ? ?

Good Post  Bad Post 
14-Apr-2011 10:10 User Research/Opinions   /   your biggest worries?       Go to Message
x 0
x 0

WP reiterates call on Price of HDB flats

Workers’ Party (WP) assistant webmaster Gerald Giam has reiterated the party’s call to peg the price of Housing and Development Board (HDB) flats to the median income of eligible buyers, and for flats to be affordable

Mr Giam was responding last night to Deputy Prime Minister Wong Kan Seng’s call to voters to ask the WP how it will implement its proposals for cheaper HDB flats.

DPM Wong had said: “If you want to pay the mortgage in 20 years, does it mean you have to pay a higher sum every month? And if you fix the price at the median income, will there also be restrictions on the sale (price)?”

Mr Giam said the high prices for the HDB flats and for housing in general “is very much because of the PAP’s asset enhancement policies ...”

# This is the INFLATION  DEVIL    ? ? ? ? #

Said Mr Giam: “ ... We want the prices to be pegged to wages rather than to the market.

#BEST to peg to cost ? ? ? ?  NEVER make profit from DEMOCRACY ? ? ? ?  GOD forbids ? ? ? ?Learn from Malaysian [JB]  HOW they build houses at lower prices ? ? ? ?#

This is public housing, this is not a profit-making endeavour ... The prices of these new flats should be based on the incomes of the average Singaporeans.”

He said the resale market could be “skewed” by wealthier people who previously owned private property and downgraded to an HDB flat and pushed up the prices, as well as foreigners and permanent residents who were buying HDB flats.

Mr Giam added that the WP is proposing “a gradual lowering of prices across the new flats so that at least housing would be available to young couples looking for their first home”.enough that mortgages can be paid off in 20 years instead of 30.

Tanya Fong

Good Post  Bad Post 
14-Apr-2011 09:42 User Research/Opinions   /   your biggest worries?       Go to Message
x 0
x 0


ADVERSARY                          vs    DEMOCRACY



RULING  party                      vs    SERVING party

   

OPPOSITION party      vs    CONTESTING party

 

Laulan      ( Date: 13-Apr-2011 16:39) Posted:



Hotokee: Rulers are supreme, they are equating them with God.

 

But God is kind, forgiving and ever generous.   He takes a little and gives alot. Supreme leaders take forever, and return peanuts. Hahaha. 

Good Post  Bad Post 
14-Apr-2011 09:27 User Research/Opinions   /   your biggest worries?       Go to Message
x 0
x 0


As NCMP is to provide VOICE from bOth  sIdes ? ? ? ?

there shOUld be One NCMP  fOr EVERY  CONSTITUENCY  ? ? ? ?

sO that VOICE from bOth sIdes  is  represented  in  EVERY  CONSTITUENCY  ? ? ? ?

pharoah88      ( Date: 14-Apr-2011 09:14) Posted:

By Channel NewsAsia, Updated: 13/04/2011

GE: WP’s Sylvia Lim comments on NCMP system

GE: WP’s Sylvia Lim comments on NCMP system



GE: WP’s Sylvia Lim comments on NCMP system

Sylvia Lim speaking in Parliament



SINGAPORE : Worker’s Party Chairman Sylvia Lim said the Non—Constituency Members of Parliament (NCMP) system remains flawed, despite allowing for more robust debate.

That’s because NCMPs do not get full voting rights, and do not represent any electorate.

At a forum on Tuesday, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong had defended the scheme against comments that NCMPs are not " real Opposition" .

He said they enjoyed full debating rights, and noted that the scheme allowed Opposition members to establish themselves and gain more visibility among the electorate.

Ms Lim fought her first election in 2006 in Aljunied GRC.

As the best—performing loser, she entered Parliament as an NCMP.

Her team garnered 43.9 per cent of votes against the People’s Action Party (PAP) team, and decided to take up the seat after considering the " effect on voters" if they had rejected the offer after a closely—fought election.

Ms Lim is currently the only non—elected Opposition MP.

The scheme was created to ensure a diversity of views.

But without full voting rights, Ms Lim said her role is limited.

For example, she could not vote against a 2007 amendment Bill she felt compromised the independence of the judiciary.

The Bill allowed the Prime Minister to nominate two members into a committee the Legal Service Commission that, among other things, decided on the promotion of district judges.

" If you just imagine at the coming election, we have a situation where Parliament consists entirely of PAP MPs and the opposition is only playing an NCMP role. I think most people would find that to be a regressive step. We are not asking for any indulgence or slack what we want is an even playing field," said Ms Lim.

" The problem can be cured if the system reverts back to single seats — that’s what we’ve been saying all along. And if the elections were held in such a manner that the boundaries are drawn by independent parties that don’t report to the Prime Minister’s Office, I think this problem will automatically resolve itself. And Opposition candidates can have an even playing field to come in on their own merits in that sense," she added.

But Ms Lim agrees her time in Parliament has made her more recognisable on the ground, which may translate into actual votes.

Analysts like Dr Gillian Koh also noted that Ms Lim has been " very valuable in creating some sort of debate" , whether on the issues of ministerial pay or CPF Life.

Some analysts said the scheme may have even lowered some risk for Opposition candidates.

" The prospects are slightly brighter, if you want to play in this game on the Opposition side. Perhaps that’s attracted a few more people into the game, because they know that something might come out of their efforts," said Dr Gillian Koh, Senior Research Fellow at the Institute of Policy Studies, NUS.

The NCMP scheme has drawn much criticism since it began in 1984.

But analysts said the scheme is here to stay, and in 2010, it was further expanded to guarantee at least nine Opposition seats in Parliament.

Despite their objections, Opposition parties have not yet committed to whether they will reject the seat if offered after this election.

As Desmond Lim, Secretary—General of the Singapore Democratic Alliance said " when we cross the bridge, we will talk about it," but voters " can’t have their cake and eat it."

If voters reject the NCMP scheme, he said, they should then vote for the Opposition.

Sebastian Teo, President of the National Solidarity Party said his personal preference is to reject the seat.

" But this all depends on the party, the CEC’s position. If a candidate, by not taking up the NCMP seat, would affect the party’s position, then I think the candidate has to consider to take up the NCMP," said Mr Teo.

Ms Lim said her party will make a decision when the outcome of the General Election (GE) is known.

" Nobody fights elections to be an NCMP," she said.

On Mr Lee’s comment that if the nine Opposition MPs organised themselves and specialised in different policy areas, they could make up two—thirds of Cabinet, she remarked: " I take the cue from that, that what he actually sees is that there is benefit to have a critical mass of Opposition MPs in Parliament to look at some of these issues. So I hope that Singaporeans can take the cue from there and vote in at least nine Opposition MPs."

— CNA /ls

Good Post  Bad Post 
14-Apr-2011 09:24 User Research/Opinions   /   your biggest worries?       Go to Message
x 0
x 0


O V E R H E A R D :

WATCH  the  REPEAT  BROADCAST.

PAY  CLOSEST  ATTENTION  TO  BODY LANGUAGE !

SPEAKER's  EYEBROWS  FELL VERY LOW 

[倒 眉 = 眉 毛 两 边 倒 挂 ] ? ? ? ?

CHECK  IT  OUT

 

pharoah88      ( Date: 13-Apr-2011 13:37) Posted:

By Channel NewsAsia, Updated: 12/04/2011

GE: Government will take note of issues raised at forum, says PM Lee

GE: Government will take note of issues raised at forum, says PM Lee



GE: Government will take note of issues raised at forum, says PM Lee

PM Lee Hsien Loong (L) and the participants



SINGAPORE: Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong told Channel NewsAsia that the recent televised forum was a good opportunity for Singaporeans to engage the government on issues, and that the government will take note of the issues raised.

" I’m happy to engage with the participants of the forum and also the questions that were sent in, email or sms, good questions, I think they are on top of most Singaporeans minds and it was good that they didn’t pull their punches and so we had a frank exchange which I hope viewers would have found not only interesting but relevant and thought provoking," said Mr Lee.

Participants also said they were encouraged by the spontaneity of the discussion, and added the forum reflects the gradual opening up of political space in Singapore.

" Contrary to maybe what people may think, this was spontaneous so it was enlightening and it was something new and different to have people selected and have issues discussed, so I think it was a progressive step," said Mr Rahayu Mahzam, lawyer at Heng Leong and Srinivasan.

" Usually the government won’t do such an open forum, LIVE telecast. Actually the perception online is this whole thing is staged, we are planted but it really is LIVE and it’s a good platform for us the citizens to express our views," said Mr Matthew Zachary Liu, student at Ngee Ann Polytechnic.

Twenty—two—year—old Matthew added: " In my generation, we are more vocal these days, be it online or on stage and we want to express our views and for the government to want to hear the young generation’s opinion, it makes us feel part of the country and makes us feel appreciated as well" .

Some participants said they would have liked to have more time with the prime minister.

Not all had the answers they were seeking.

Businessman Kurt Wee said: " Some of the issues really got to do with whether there is enough room for political expression or participation of the opposition parties.

" If you don’t give them enough space for them to grow and mature, I think we could be setting ourselves up for a risk in the longer term.

" I’m not convinced with the fact that we don’t have enough talents in Singapore, I’m not convinced with the fact that the NMP (nominated member of parliament) system and the NCMP (non—constituency member of parliament) system is sufficient for our country.

" I think you really need a voting Member of Parliament on the alternative side that can vote in Parliament" .

View the show Question Time with the Prime Minister

here

—CNA/cc/wk

Good Post  Bad Post 
14-Apr-2011 09:14 User Research/Opinions   /   your biggest worries?       Go to Message
x 0
x 0
By Channel NewsAsia, Updated: 13/04/2011

GE: WP’s Sylvia Lim comments on NCMP system

GE: WP’s Sylvia Lim comments on NCMP system



GE: WP’s Sylvia Lim comments on NCMP system

Sylvia Lim speaking in Parliament



SINGAPORE : Worker’s Party Chairman Sylvia Lim said the Non—Constituency Members of Parliament (NCMP) system remains flawed, despite allowing for more robust debate.

That’s because NCMPs do not get full voting rights, and do not represent any electorate.

At a forum on Tuesday, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong had defended the scheme against comments that NCMPs are not " real Opposition" .

He said they enjoyed full debating rights, and noted that the scheme allowed Opposition members to establish themselves and gain more visibility among the electorate.

Ms Lim fought her first election in 2006 in Aljunied GRC.

As the best—performing loser, she entered Parliament as an NCMP.

Her team garnered 43.9 per cent of votes against the People’s Action Party (PAP) team, and decided to take up the seat after considering the " effect on voters" if they had rejected the offer after a closely—fought election.

Ms Lim is currently the only non—elected Opposition MP.

The scheme was created to ensure a diversity of views.

But without full voting rights, Ms Lim said her role is limited.

For example, she could not vote against a 2007 amendment Bill she felt compromised the independence of the judiciary.

The Bill allowed the Prime Minister to nominate two members into a committee the Legal Service Commission that, among other things, decided on the promotion of district judges.

" If you just imagine at the coming election, we have a situation where Parliament consists entirely of PAP MPs and the opposition is only playing an NCMP role. I think most people would find that to be a regressive step. We are not asking for any indulgence or slack what we want is an even playing field," said Ms Lim.

" The problem can be cured if the system reverts back to single seats — that’s what we’ve been saying all along. And if the elections were held in such a manner that the boundaries are drawn by independent parties that don’t report to the Prime Minister’s Office, I think this problem will automatically resolve itself. And Opposition candidates can have an even playing field to come in on their own merits in that sense," she added.

But Ms Lim agrees her time in Parliament has made her more recognisable on the ground, which may translate into actual votes.

Analysts like Dr Gillian Koh also noted that Ms Lim has been " very valuable in creating some sort of debate" , whether on the issues of ministerial pay or CPF Life.

Some analysts said the scheme may have even lowered some risk for Opposition candidates.

" The prospects are slightly brighter, if you want to play in this game on the Opposition side. Perhaps that’s attracted a few more people into the game, because they know that something might come out of their efforts," said Dr Gillian Koh, Senior Research Fellow at the Institute of Policy Studies, NUS.

The NCMP scheme has drawn much criticism since it began in 1984.

But analysts said the scheme is here to stay, and in 2010, it was further expanded to guarantee at least nine Opposition seats in Parliament.

Despite their objections, Opposition parties have not yet committed to whether they will reject the seat if offered after this election.

As Desmond Lim, Secretary—General of the Singapore Democratic Alliance said " when we cross the bridge, we will talk about it," but voters " can’t have their cake and eat it."

If voters reject the NCMP scheme, he said, they should then vote for the Opposition.

Sebastian Teo, President of the National Solidarity Party said his personal preference is to reject the seat.

" But this all depends on the party, the CEC’s position. If a candidate, by not taking up the NCMP seat, would affect the party’s position, then I think the candidate has to consider to take up the NCMP," said Mr Teo.

Ms Lim said her party will make a decision when the outcome of the General Election (GE) is known.

" Nobody fights elections to be an NCMP," she said.

On Mr Lee’s comment that if the nine Opposition MPs organised themselves and specialised in different policy areas, they could make up two—thirds of Cabinet, she remarked: " I take the cue from that, that what he actually sees is that there is benefit to have a critical mass of Opposition MPs in Parliament to look at some of these issues. So I hope that Singaporeans can take the cue from there and vote in at least nine Opposition MPs."

— CNA /ls
Good Post  Bad Post 
13-Apr-2011 14:54 User Research/Opinions   /   your biggest worries?       Go to Message
x 0
x 0
Updated: 13/03/2011

Ruling party gears up for contest in Moulmein-Kallang GRC



# # # #

WHY  such  DOMINATING TEAM  is Used ? ? ? ?

WHY  nOt  known as  SERVING PARTY ? ? ? ?

WHO  is the PARTY  RULING ? ? ? ?

Is  every PARTY  RULING Or SERVING the  CITIZENS ? ? ? ?
Good Post  Bad Post 
13-Apr-2011 14:42 User Research/Opinions   /   your biggest worries?       Go to Message
x 0
x 0

HDB acquires 39 flats from owners

for infringing subletting rules

SINGAPORE

Owners in another 56 cases were fined, according to a statement released by the HDB yesterday.

Following policy changes in March last year designed to deal with speculators, the HDB reportedly launched an unprecedented crackdown on owners who let out their flats illegally.

In comparison, the HDB took action against a total of 56 owners between January 2008 and December 2009.

The number of inspections carried out more than doubled from 3,000 in 2009 to 7,000 last year, with public feedback playing a greater role in the inspections, HDB added.

The HDB warned it would take “stern action” — including compulsory acquisition — against unauthourised subletting, especially in cases where the flat owners buy the flat purely for monetary gain with no intention of occupying it.

In the case of the Pinnacle@Duxton flat, the owner had sublet the entire flat without the HDB’s approval in the guise of subletting the rooms, shortly after its purchase in January last year.

During its night inspections in May and June 2010, the HDB found that the owner was not staying in the flat and investigations revealed that the owner had bought it for monetary gain.

In other cases, owners tried to circumvent the HDB’s rules by locking up one room and subletting the rest of the flat without physically staying in it.

Such cases will be treated as unauthourised subletting of the entire flat, said the HDB.

Flat owners who wish to sublet their entire flats must meet the minimum occupation period and obtain the HDB’s approval before they can do so.

# # # #

WHY nO jaIl  SENTENCE ? ? ? ?— The Housing and Development Board (HDB) compulsorily acquired 39 flats, including one at the Pinnacle@, from their owners last year for Duxtonblatantly infringing subletting rules.

Good Post  Bad Post 
13-Apr-2011 14:36 Others   /   POEM Trading Platform       Go to Message
x 0
x 0


high brokerage tOO

And very calcUlatIve  In  cUstOmer servIce

DUMP IT
Good Post  Bad Post 
13-Apr-2011 14:35 User Research/Opinions   /   MAY BANK initiates GROWTH ERA tOday       Go to Message
x 0
x 0

Najib proposes 15% flat income tax to lure back talented Malaysians

KUALA LUMPUR

Prime Minister Najib Razak said yesterday that the new transitional income tax incentive will be introduced alongside other incentives for returning Malaysian experts.

“I certainly hope these various changes will encourage more Malaysians working abroad with their varied experience and expertise to return and play an active part in our country’s economic transformation,” Mr Najib said at the opening of the Invest Malaysia 2011 conference.

His remarks drew gasps of surprise from conference delegates, reported

According to the Malaysian Industrial Development Authority’s website, resident individuals working in Malaysia are currently subjected to a graduated tax rate of up to 26 per cent on income earned in the country, after deducting personal reliefs.

Individuals who do not meet residence requirements are taxed at a flat rate of 26 per cent.

Other changes in store include limiting the current tax-free incentive for two cars under the REP to locally-assembled vehicles, and the introduction of new Residence Passes which will allow highly-skilled foreign workers to stay in Malaysia for 10 years.

According to the World Bank, the number of Malaysians leaving the country rose by more than 100-fold in a 45-year period, from 9,576 Malaysian emigrants in 1960 to 1,489,168 in 2005.

In an effort to reverse the brain drain, the Najib administration launched the Talent-Corp Malaysia agency last year to try and lure back the Malaysian diaspora and scout for foreign skilled professionals.

Mr Najib said that the TalentCorp will be taking the lead in the REP and has revised the programme parameters and qualifying criteria which will be announced in full at a later date. — The Malaysian government is hoping to lure Malaysian professionals working abroad with a flat income tax rate of 15 per cent for five years under the Returning Experts Programme (REP).The Malaysian Insider.Agencies

Good Post  Bad Post 
13-Apr-2011 14:30 User Research/Opinions   /   MAY BANK initiates GROWTH ERA tOday       Go to Message
x 0
x 0

M’sia’s capital markets to double

to s$1.9 trillion by 2020: Najib

KUALA LUMPUR

“With greater internationalisation, this figure could increase to as much as RM5.8 trillion over the same period,” Mr Najib said in his keynote address at the Invest Malaysia conference, an annual gathering of Malaysia’s top corporate leaders.

The Malaysian capital markets are now worth RM2 trillion, said Mr Najib, who is also Finance Minister.

Under the capital markets master plan, the government will make changes to the regulatory framework for fund raising and product creation, among other things, and allocate more funds to develop the venture capital and private equity industry, he said.

“And to boost large-scale transactions, access to the bond market will also be widened, strengthening investor appetite for a wide range of debt products and credit risks, expanding participation of the investment management industry and retail investors in fixed income investments, enhancing the market infrastructure,” Mr Najib added.

He also said the internationalisation of the capital market would be a necessary pre-requisite to strengthening Malaysia’s role as an Islamic capital market hub. The Islamic capital market in Malaysia is set to increase almost threefold to RM2.9 trillion by 2020 from RM1.1 trillion in 2010, he said.

Mr Najib also gave more details of the government’s plan to divest or pare its holdings in state-linked companies. The move is aimed at increasing liquidity in the country’s stock market and attracting more foreign investment while also raising capital to fund the country’s ambitious economic transformation plan, which seeks to raise Malaysia’s average per capita income to US$15,000 (S$18,850) by 2020 from about US$7,000 at present.

Mr Najib said the listing of the federal land authority Felda Global’s sugar refining unit, Malayan Sugar Manufacturing Co, would likely take place in July.

He added that Khazanah Nasional and other state-owned firms would divest stakes in at least 10 non-core assets by the end of the year. — Malaysia’s capital markets are expected to more than double in size to RM4.5 trillion (S$1.9 trillion) by 2020, Prime Minister Najib Razak said yesterday as he announced a new 10-year blueprint to boost competitiveness.Dow Jones

Good Post  Bad Post 
13-Apr-2011 14:25 User Research/Opinions   /   your biggest worries?       Go to Message
x 0
x 0

The three topics the SDP wants to debate:

The Youth Olympic Games (YOG) budget

Holland-Bukit Panjang Town Council’s S$8-million investment in toxic structured products in 2008

and “the buy-over of the Fajar wet market in Bukit Panjang by Sheng Siong, which caused rentals and prices to increase”.

# # # #

Is thIs an " A" TEAM ? ? ? ?

Or a " F" TEAM ? ? ? ?

Good Post  Bad Post 
13-Apr-2011 14:21 User Research/Opinions   /   your biggest worries?       Go to Message
x 0
x 0

The Opposition party then issued on Monday a formal invitation to Dr Balakrishnan, who is Community Development, Youth and Sports Minister, and extended it to Bukit Panjang’s incumbent Member of Parliament Teo Ho Pin.

WHY is such DISCRIMINATING TERM being USED ? ? ? ?

ISn'T  every  party  COMPETING to SERVE the CITIZENS ? ? ? ?

It sOUnds as thOUgh  the COMPETING PARTY is gOing to OPPOSE making the CITIZENS  WEALTHIER ? ? ? ?

Good Post  Bad Post 
First   < Newer   2661-2680 of 13894   Older>   Last  



ShareJunction Version: 27 Nov 2020 ver - All Rights Reserved. Copyright ShareJunction Pte. Ltd. Disclaimer: All prices from are delayed. ShareJunction does not provide you with any financial advice. We are not into the business of providing any investment advice. See our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy of using this website. Data is delayed for varying periods of time depending on the exchange, but for at least 15 minutes. Copyright © SIX Financial Information Ltd. and its licensors. All Rights reserved. Further distribution and use by third parties prohibited. SIX Financial Information and its licensors make no warranty for information displayed and accept no liability for data and prices. SIX Financial Information reserves the right to adapt and/or alter this website at any time without prior notice.

Web design by FoundationFlux. Hosted with Signetique Cloud.