/> ShareJunction - Member Posts
logo transparent gif
top_white_spacer
Home Latest Stock Forum Topics MyCorner - Personal Stocks Porfolio Stock Lists Investor Insights Investor Research & Links Dynamic Stock Charting FREE Registration About Us top spacer top spacer
 User Password Auto-Login
Enter Stock
 
righttip
branding

Back

Latest Posts By pharoah88 - Supreme      About pharoah88
First   < Newer   12161-12180 of 13894   Older>   Last  

26-Mar-2010 15:47 Keppel Land   /   Kepland       Go to Message
x 0
x 0
Reflection is owned by Kep Corp  or Kep Land ?

ozone2002      ( Date: 26-Mar-2010 10:24) Posted:



kepland doing good..

sold out reflection..except 1 unit..

Good Post  Bad Post 
26-Mar-2010 15:42 Healthway Med   /   healthway, healthy?       Go to Message
x 0
x 0

Hovering near slope support of potential ascending triangle.

A rebound here will retest the horizontal resistance of the triangle. Immediate support is the green support zone. Support confluence is the intersection of the lower dual band boundary of light blue channel and the dual band slope of the triangle.

Support failure here will probably find new support at the light blue area and attempt to create a new slope support there.



pharoah88      ( Date: 26-Mar-2010 15:40) Posted:


Good Post  Bad Post 
26-Mar-2010 15:40 Healthway Med   /   healthway, healthy?       Go to Message
x 0
x 0
Good Post  Bad Post 
26-Mar-2010 14:23 AusGroup   /   AUSGROUP: 1H09 revenue up 28.8% to reach A$260.5 m       Go to Message
x 0
x 0
this is a One NiGHT STAND
Good Post  Bad Post 
26-Mar-2010 14:19 TeleChoice Intl   /   Telechoice       Go to Message
x 0
x 0


vOlume  it  tOO  lOw.

there are nO  SELLER

can  hardly  buy
Good Post  Bad Post 
26-Mar-2010 14:15 StarHub   /   Starhub       Go to Message
x 0
x 0

The country's three local cellular operators--SingTel, Mobile One (M1) and StarHub--have WBA (wireless broadband access) spectrum rights to allow them to operate WiMax services, but none has yet done so.

Since the THREE PLAYERS are inter-related, they probably will adopt any new technology at the SAME TIME for the mock up play.

there will be  no early adopter, no fear, no threat to anyone.

Ultimately,  consumers  are BIGGEST  LOSERS.



humblepie      ( Date: 26-Mar-2010 07:11) Posted:

S'pore WiMax beckons foreign operators





SINGAPORE--The country's WiMax market holds little draw for local mobile broadband providers, most of which have sunk heavy investments in 3G cellular broadband instead, according to an industry analyst.

Speaking to ZDNet Asia in an interview, IDC Asia-Pacific's Patrick Chan, chief technology advisor of emerging technologies, said WiMax has not been attractive to local players because of their investments in 3G, seen as a competing mobile broadband technology.

WiMax also holds technical limitations that have proven unsuitable for some parts of Singapore, said Chan. Like Wi-Fi, WiMax transmission requires line of sight to be effective and this may be prohibitive in central areas within the island-state that are populated by high-rise buildings, he explained.

The country's three local cellular operators--SingTel, Mobile One (M1) and StarHub--have WBA (wireless broadband access) spectrum rights to allow them to operate WiMax services, but none has yet done so.

In response to an e-mail query from ZDNet Asia, a SingTel representative cited the lack of devices as a barrier.

"SingTel has conducted WiMax trials but we feel that WiMax has not reached mass adoption due to limited device availability," she said, adding that as such, the telco is not confident WiMax will provide satisfactory "end-to-end customer experience".

However, Chan noted that there is opportunity for WiMax to fill a QoS (quality of service) void left by 3G.

"[3G] bandwidth is not optimal yet," the analyst said. To that end, Green Packet's announcement last week to provide WiMax services in Singapore "makes sense", marking a step forward for the Malaysian WiMax operator's aspirations to expand in the region.

Green Packet's subsidiary, Packet One (P1), will be able to build on its experience in WiMax and providing last-mile coverage in Malaysia, he said. Chan noted that Singapore, as a neighboring country with no dominant WiMax provider, is a logical point of expansion for the Malaysian operator.

Limited WiMax commercialization
So far, Singapore's commercial WiMax deployments have been limited to a network deployment along the country's southern coastline, which is part a government initiative.

P1 last week said its WiMax push in the island-state will be committed to providing supplementary bandwidth to ease existing network congestion.

According to Chan, having nationwide WiMax coverage in Singapore will help provide bandwidth for the myriad of mobile services "waiting to be connected" such as location-based services (LBS).

He noted that P1's plans in the country may serve to jolt M1 into action. The mobile operator last month acquired local WiMax player, Qala.

In an e-mail interview Monday, a P1 spokesperson said it expects to launch commercial WiMax services in Singapore "within the second half of 2010" and intends to open its offerings to both corporate and consumer segments.

P1 also anticipates the upcoming availability of WiMax devices such as "embedded netbooks, notebooks and mobile Internet devices (MIDs)" to encourage takeup of its services, he said.

Pacnet out of wholesale game
P1's takeover of Pacnet's WBA spectrum rights, which is still pending regulatory approval, effectively ends Pacnet's former plans to provide wholesale WiMax access in Singapore.

While the service provider has sold one of its three Facilities-Based Operator (FBO) licenses to P1, the transfer of its WBA rights means Pacnet can no longer operate as a WiMax provider here.

FBO licenses are required by the local infocomm regulator, Infocomm Development Authority, for an operator to deploy any telecommunications services in the country.

According to a Pacific Internet filing to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Pacnet owns 30MHz of spectrum in Singapore. P1 confirmed its acquisition of a total of 30MHz of Pacnet's spectrum.

M1 could not respond at press time.


 

Good Post  Bad Post 
26-Mar-2010 13:54 Healthway Med   /   healthway, healthy?       Go to Message
x 0
x 0


1.  Can majority shareholders  SELL majority shares 

     via  Nominee Accounts  withOUT informing SGX ??

2.  Can majority shareholders  SELL Management Placment shares

     via  Nominee Accounts  withOUT informing  SGX ??

3.  Is this a  SGX  Governance  lOOp hOle ??

4.  How can  SGX  supervise  Insiders  Trading 

     done  via  Nominee  Accounts?

5.  How can  SGX  supervise  the  Transfer  of

     Insiders'  shares  to  and  from  Nominee  Accounts?

WHERE  can  these  answers  be  FOUND?  
Good Post  Bad Post 
26-Mar-2010 13:37 Hong Leong Asia   /   Hong Leong Asia       Go to Message
x 0
x 0
multi-bagger  10+ TiMES  in  One Year
Good Post  Bad Post 
26-Mar-2010 13:35 Hong Leong Asia   /   Hong Leong Asia       Go to Message
x 0
x 0
HL Asia Symbol:
H22
Currency:
Singapore Dollar
Last: 4.74 + 0.15 Vol (K): 1923.0
Corporate Action - Cum Dividend
Trading
Updated Time 26-Mar 12:32
Open 4.61 High 4.74 Low 4.6
Prev Close 4.59 Buy - Sell -
Volume(K) 1923.0 Buy Vol(K) - Sell Vol(K) -
52 Wk High 4.61 52 Wk Low 0.45 52 Wk Avg Vol 906.949
All Time High 4.66 All Time Low 0.3    
Comments Near 52 wk high

*Reporting Currency in SGD
Important: ShareJunction obtains our finance data from a third party. Check financial year before use. EPS values are recorded up to two decimal points.
Financials
Date Updated 26 Feb 2010 Financial Year 31 Dec 2008
Current Year Profit
(After Tax) $'000,000
41.977 Previous Year Profit
(After Tax) $'000,000
95.428
Net Asset Per Share 1.34 Turnover $'000,000 21.29
Current Year EPS
(After Interest and Tax)
0.11 Previous Year EPS
(After Interest and Tax)
0.25
PE Ratio (After Tax) 33.5 Times Covered 2.2
Price (at update time) 3.68 Dividend Yield 0.01

*Technical Analysis Information is updated Daily
Technicals
RSI 83.71 Williams %R -8.54
Comments (RSI) Overbought Comments (W%R) Overbought
Good Post  Bad Post 
26-Mar-2010 13:12 Healthway Med   /   healthway, healthy?       Go to Message
x 0
x 0

DiRECTORS  should  SPEND TIME TO 

GROW  BUSINESS

INCREASE  PROFITS 

MULTIPLY  YIELDS

DISTRIBUTE  DIVIDENDS



pharoah88      ( Date: 26-Mar-2010 10:13) Posted:

Are  Healthway Medical  Directors  FAITHFUL  to  their  SHAREHOLDERS?

Good Post  Bad Post 
26-Mar-2010 13:08 Healthway Med   /   healthway, healthy?       Go to Message
x 0
x 0


Friday, 26th March 2010  nOOn  CLOSING

S$0.170  4,489,000   BOUGHT  frOm  SELLER

jUices  bUilt  Up  a little
Good Post  Bad Post 
26-Mar-2010 12:59 Chemoil Ene USD   /   CHEMOIL       Go to Message
x 0
x 0


"讲骗话者, 不得好死"

turned  faces  GREEN

at  Board Meetings

and AGMs
Good Post  Bad Post 
26-Mar-2010 12:54 Chemoil Ene USD   /   CHEMOIL       Go to Message
x 0
x 0

it was SAGE's  original  Statement  in  Mandarin



Hulumas      ( Date: 26-Mar-2010 11:36) Posted:

Is it S-chip stock?

pharoah88      ( Date: 26-Mar-2010 11:02) Posted:

"讲骗话者, 不得好死"


Good Post  Bad Post 
26-Mar-2010 12:50 Chinese Global   /   Middle East is very hot       Go to Message
x 0
x 0
$ Auswin Symbol:
5CJ
Currency:
Singapore Dollar
Last: 0.09 No Change Vol (K): 0.0
Trading
Updated Time 26-Mar 12:11
Open - High - Low -
Prev Close 0.09 Buy - Sell -
Volume(K) 0.0 Buy Vol(K) - Sell Vol(K) -
52 Wk High 0.11 52 Wk Low 0.04 52 Wk Avg Vol 1722.632
All Time High 0.45 All Time Low 0.02    
Comments No Info

*Reporting Currency in SGD
Important: ShareJunction obtains our finance data from a third party. Check financial year before use. EPS values are recorded up to two decimal points.
Financials
Date Updated 26 Feb 2010 Financial Year 30 Jun 2009
Current Year Profit
(After Tax) $'000,000
-2.625 Previous Year Profit
(After Tax) $'000,000
-5.151
Net Asset Per Share 0.02 Turnover $'000,000 13.72
Current Year EPS
(After Interest and Tax)
0.0 Previous Year EPS
(After Interest and Tax)
-0.01
PE Ratio (After Tax) 0.0 Times Covered 0.0
Price (at update time) 0.085 Dividend Yield 0.0

*Technical Analysis Information is updated Daily
Technicals
RSI 48.38 Williams %R -50.0
Comments (RSI) No Info Comments (W%R) No Info
Good Post  Bad Post 
26-Mar-2010 12:44 Genting HK USD   /   Star Cruise       Go to Message
x 0
x 0
jUicEr  is  at   Genting HK  since yesterday
Good Post  Bad Post 
26-Mar-2010 12:41 PacShipTr US$   /   PST       Go to Message
x 0
x 0


PST  will create HIGH YIELD (@ 20% or mOre) NEW REVENUE with  such "gOOd  bUy"  NEW SHIPS  frOm  RMT AUCTION  if  the  SHIPS  are  suitable.

this is the BEST TiME  to  buy  NEW SHIPS  at  low  low  low  COST.

*PST  is  financially in  this  PRIVILEGED  POSITION*

to  DOUBLE  its  20% Plus  HiGH YIELD CAPACITY
Good Post  Bad Post 
26-Mar-2010 12:35 PacShipTr US$   /   PST       Go to Message
x 0
x 0

PST  can  PiCK appropriate RMT new ships

(which are perhaps worth about half of what they cost)

and BiD  from  one-tenth to one-quarter of cost at the AUCTION. 

SHIP Assets  Auction  by China Banks happened in 2007. 


# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #  # #

christan      ( Date: 26-Mar-2010 11:08) Posted:



 

 this will total wipe off the equity 395m, making -equity,  worth nothing. better avoid
Implications of the April maturity of the US$130m loan
facility. RMT had US$110.7m in cash as of 31 Dec but the
question is if the remaining seven lenders will be willing to
release that cash to only three lenders, considering the
outstanding capital commitment of US$918.6m and the very
likely breached loan-to-value covenants on the existing
US$773.8m loans. The key determinant of the outcome is
how close the banks and the sponsor are to reaching an overall
agreement (which is in approximately month 12 of
discussions). We re-iterate that it is not in the sponsor's best
interest for RMT to default as the sponsor will end up footing
the bill for the new ships (which are perhaps worth about half
of what they cost)
.
The lenders are probably not keen to see
a default situation either (especially if they also lend to the
sponsor). The likely outcome is that the burden will eventually
be passed to RMT's unitholders through dilution via fresh
equity.
Uncertainty driving volatility - witness thehttp://www.remisiers.org/research//Rickmers%20Maritime-100325-OIR.pdf



Hulumas      ( Date: 24-Mar-2010 14:58) Posted:

Too slow moving and relatively long term yet low yield.

pharoah88      ( Date: 24-Mar-2010 11:09) Posted:



Rickmers Maritime: Vessel secures new employment at 65% great discounts

Summary: Rickmers Maritime (RMT) announced that its vessel - Kaethe C. Rickmers (formerly Maersk Djibouti) - has secured employment with South American liner CSAV. The agreement is for a one-year charter at US$8,288 a day, and also gives CSAV the option to renew the charter for another 12 months at US$23,888 a day. We note that the vessel was earlier earning US$22,708 a day with Maersk. The US$8,288 rate is below our estimate of US$10,000 a day - but it is a far better alternative to not securing any employment at all (which had seemed a likely possibility a few weeks ago).

We note that CSAV is a current charterer of Pacific Shipping Trust;

the liner has made great strides in resolving its own financial difficulties.

Meanwhile, RMT's auditor Pricewaterhouse Coopers (PwC) said it was not in a position to express an opinion on the trust's FY09 results due to unresolved negotiations on maturing loans and large capital commitments. RMT's unit price fell 26% yesterday as a result (even though there was no new information except for the Business Times reporting that its sources say a deal has yet to be struck with the banks). We will be adjusting our earnings estimates to reflect the new CSAV charter.

In the meantime, we maintain our SELL rating and                                                                        S$0.18 fair value for RICKMERS MARITIME             . (Meenal Kumar)


Good Post  Bad Post 
26-Mar-2010 12:27 RickmersMaritime   /   Container ships charterer with 170+ years history       Go to Message
x 0
x 0

PST  can  PiCK appropriate new ships (which are perhaps worth about half of what they cost) and BiD  from  one-tenth to one-quarter of cost at the AUCTION. 

SHIP Assets  Auction by China Banks happened in 2007. 



christan      ( Date: 26-Mar-2010 11:08) Posted:



 

 this will total wipe off the equity 395m, making -equity,  worth nothing. better avoid
Implications of the April maturity of the US$130m loan
facility. RMT had US$110.7m in cash as of 31 Dec but the
question is if the remaining seven lenders will be willing to
release that cash to only three lenders, considering the
outstanding capital commitment of US$918.6m and the very
likely breached loan-to-value covenants on the existing
US$773.8m loans. The key determinant of the outcome is
how close the banks and the sponsor are to reaching an overall
agreement (which is in approximately month 12 of
discussions). We re-iterate that it is not in the sponsor's best
interest for RMT to default as the sponsor will end up footing
the bill for the new ships (which are perhaps worth about half
of what they cost)
.
The lenders are probably not keen to see
a default situation either (especially if they also lend to the
sponsor). The likely outcome is that the burden will eventually
be passed to RMT's unitholders through dilution via fresh
equity.
Uncertainty driving volatility - witness thehttp://www.remisiers.org/research//Rickmers%20Maritime-100325-OIR.pdf


Good Post  Bad Post 
26-Mar-2010 12:21 RickmersMaritime   /   Container ships charterer with 170+ years history       Go to Message
x 0
x 0

NO-FEAR-ERS  buy  nOw  and 

bEt  spOnsOr  will  SAVE  the  SHIPS



christan      ( Date: 26-Mar-2010 11:08) Posted:



 

 this will total wipe off the equity 395m, making -equity,  worth nothing. better avoid
Implications of the April maturity of the US$130m loan
facility. RMT had US$110.7m in cash as of 31 Dec but the
question is if the remaining seven lenders will be willing to
release that cash to only three lenders, considering the
outstanding capital commitment of US$918.6m and the very
likely breached loan-to-value covenants on the existing
US$773.8m loans. The key determinant of the outcome is
how close the banks and the sponsor are to reaching an overall
agreement (which is in approximately month 12 of
discussions). We re-iterate that it is not in the sponsor's best
interest for RMT to default as the sponsor will end up footing
the bill for the new ships (which are perhaps worth about half
of what they cost)
.
The lenders are probably not keen to see
a default situation either (especially if they also lend to the
sponsor). The likely outcome is that the burden will eventually
be passed to RMT's unitholders through dilution via fresh
equity.
Uncertainty driving volatility - witness thehttp://www.remisiers.org/research//Rickmers%20Maritime-100325-OIR.pdf


Good Post  Bad Post 
26-Mar-2010 12:16 PineAgritech   /   handon trading...       Go to Message
x 0
x 0
nO-FEarErs  buy  nOw and  bEt  it  will return  to S$0.200
Good Post  Bad Post 
First   < Newer   12161-12180 of 13894   Older>   Last  



ShareJunction Version: 27 Nov 2020 ver - All Rights Reserved. Copyright ShareJunction Pte. Ltd. Disclaimer: All prices from are delayed. ShareJunction does not provide you with any financial advice. We are not into the business of providing any investment advice. See our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy of using this website. Data is delayed for varying periods of time depending on the exchange, but for at least 15 minutes. Copyright © SIX Financial Information Ltd. and its licensors. All Rights reserved. Further distribution and use by third parties prohibited. SIX Financial Information and its licensors make no warranty for information displayed and accept no liability for data and prices. SIX Financial Information reserves the right to adapt and/or alter this website at any time without prior notice.

Web design by FoundationFlux. Hosted with Signetique Cloud.