ShareJunction - Member Posts

x 0

from the START, mOther RG did not prepare herself to FINANCE the 7 NEW SHIPS.

daughter RMT was incorporated as a SHIP FINANCE SPECIALIST which undertook to FINANCE the 7 NEW SHIPS.

nOw where can mOther RG in the very LAST MINUTER lOOk for a SUGARY DADDY to FINANCE the 7 NEW SHIPS.

Have a CLEAR PICTURE OF this SHIP FINANCING GAME ????

CONSIDER C F Ds ????

x 0

is the CLARIFICATION MISLEADING ? ? ? ?

IT IS a SURE LOSE SURE DIE CASE ? ? ? ?

SEVEN NEW SHIPS NOW WORTH LESS THAN 50% ITS HIGH COST.

WHOEVER TAKES OVER THE FULL COST WILL DIE FOR SURE ? ? ? ?

IF mOther Rickmers Group takes OVER at FIRE SALE PRiCE, Rickmers Maritime Trust [RMT]

will iMMEDIATELY DiE STRAiGHT STRAiGHT as WELL.

ANY WAY ALSO DIE ? SURE DIE ?? MUST DIE ???

# BEWARE # AWARE # CARE #

pharoah88 ( Date: 01-Apr-2010 17:21) Posted:

"....Rickmers Group is prepared to take back seven containership newbuildings….. that Singapore-listed Rickmers Maritime Trust (RMT) is struggling to finance.”

iF the mOther Rickmers Group take back the NEW SHIPS, mOther RG might be KILLED ending up LOSING OWN PRIVATE MONEY ?

it is suspected that mOst Business Owners wOuld rather LOSE PUBLIC MONEY and let Rickmers Maritime Trust bear the brant ??

WHICH DO YOU BELIEVE ??

TiME WiLL TELL TRUTH

TiME cannOt LIE

pharoah88 ( Date: 01-Apr-2010 17:06) Posted:

For immediate release

RICKMERS MARITIME PROVIDES CLARIFICATION REGARDING TRADEWINDS ARTICLE

Singapore, 1 April 2010 –

The article states that “

These seven containerships refer to the three 4,250 TEU Hanjin vessels and the four 13,100 TEU Maersk vessels that are due to be delivered to the Trust.

The Trust would like to clarify that while it has been in negotiations with Rickmers Group regarding these containerships, and these negotiations have been positive. The final action concerning these ships will depend on the outcome of negotiations in relation to the Trust’s financing issues with its lending banks and subject to unitholders’ approval.

Advanced negotiations with the Trust’s lending banks are still ongoing. The Trustee-Manager will keep the shareholders informed and updated on material developments in respect of the above matters. Further announcements will be made as and when appropriate in a timely manner.

Unitholders and investors are advised to exercise caution in their dealings with the Trust’s units.
Rickmers Trust Management Pte. Ltd., Trustee-Manager of Rickmers Maritime (the “Trust”), refers to the article titled “To the rescue of Singapore trust in soup with seven boxships” in TradeWinds, dated 1 April 2010.Rickmers Group is prepared to take back seven containership newbuildings….. that Singapore-listed Rickmers Maritime Trust (RMT) is struggling to finance.”
End

x 0

"....Rickmers Group is prepared to take back seven containership newbuildings….. that Singapore-listed Rickmers Maritime Trust (RMT) is struggling to finance.”

iF the mOther Rickmers Group take back the NEW SHIPS, mOther RG might be KILLED ending up LOSING OWN PRIVATE MONEY ?

it is suspected that mOst Business Owners wOuld rather LOSE PUBLIC MONEY and let Rickmers Maritime Trust bear the brant ??

WHICH DO YOU BELIEVE ??

TiME WiLL TELL TRUTH

TiME cannOt LIE

pharoah88 ( Date: 01-Apr-2010 17:06) Posted:

For immediate release

RICKMERS MARITIME PROVIDES CLARIFICATION REGARDING TRADEWINDS ARTICLE

Singapore, 1 April 2010 –

The article states that “

These seven containerships refer to the three 4,250 TEU Hanjin vessels and the four 13,100 TEU Maersk vessels that are due to be delivered to the Trust.

The Trust would like to clarify that while it has been in negotiations with Rickmers Group regarding these containerships, and these negotiations have been positive. The final action concerning these ships will depend on the outcome of negotiations in relation to the Trust’s financing issues with its lending banks and subject to unitholders’ approval.

Advanced negotiations with the Trust’s lending banks are still ongoing. The Trustee-Manager will keep the shareholders informed and updated on material developments in respect of the above matters. Further announcements will be made as and when appropriate in a timely manner.

Unitholders and investors are advised to exercise caution in their dealings with the Trust’s units.
Rickmers Trust Management Pte. Ltd., Trustee-Manager of Rickmers Maritime (the “Trust”), refers to the article titled “To the rescue of Singapore trust in soup with seven boxships” in TradeWinds, dated 1 April 2010.Rickmers Group is prepared to take back seven containership newbuildings….. that Singapore-listed Rickmers Maritime Trust (RMT) is struggling to finance.”
End

Bon3260 ( Date: 01-Apr-2010 13:45) Posted:

MISCELLANEOUS

* Asterisks denote mandatory information

Name of Announcer *	RICKMERS MARITIME
Company Registration No.	N.A.
Announcement submitted on behalf of	RICKMERS MARITIME
Announcement is submitted with respect to *	RICKMERS MARITIME
Announcement is submitted by *	Lynn Wan Tiew Leng
Designation *	Company Secretary
Date & Time of Broadcast	01-Apr-2010 13:37:56
Announcement No.	00057

>> ANNOUNCEMENT DETAILS

The details of the announcement start here ...

Announcement Title *

RICKMERS MARITIME PROVIDES CLARIFICATION REGARDING TRADEWINDS ARTICLE

Description

Please see attached.

Attachments

Press_Release_Clarification_1_Apr_10_v2.pdf

Total size = 48K
(2048K size limit recommended)

x 0

tOuch the lOw Of S$0.320 and

CLOSED the day at S$0.330.

pharoah88 ( Date: 01-Apr-2010 16:35) Posted:

tOday is LAST DAY Of wEEk

BEWARE AWARE CARE

pharoah88 ( Date: 01-Apr-2010 16:27) Posted:

4:26PM

SELLING at S$0.325 to BUYER QUEUE

x 0

For immediate release

RICKMERS MARITIME PROVIDES CLARIFICATION REGARDING TRADEWINDS ARTICLE

Singapore, 1 April 2010 –

The article states that “

These seven containerships refer to the three 4,250 TEU Hanjin vessels and the four 13,100 TEU Maersk vessels that are due to be delivered to the Trust.

The Trust would like to clarify that while it has been in negotiations with Rickmers Group regarding these containerships, and these negotiations have been positive. The final action concerning these ships will depend on the outcome of negotiations in relation to the Trust’s financing issues with its lending banks and subject to unitholders’ approval.

Advanced negotiations with the Trust’s lending banks are still ongoing. The Trustee-Manager will keep the shareholders informed and updated on material developments in respect of the above matters. Further announcements will be made as and when appropriate in a timely manner.

Unitholders and investors are advised to exercise caution in their dealings with the Trust’s units.
Rickmers Trust Management Pte. Ltd., Trustee-Manager of Rickmers Maritime (the “Trust”), refers to the article titled “To the rescue of Singapore trust in soup with seven boxships” in TradeWinds, dated 1 April 2010.Rickmers Group is prepared to take back seven containership newbuildings….. that Singapore-listed Rickmers Maritime Trust (RMT) is struggling to finance.”
End

Bon3260 ( Date: 01-Apr-2010 13:45) Posted:

MISCELLANEOUS

* Asterisks denote mandatory information

Name of Announcer *	RICKMERS MARITIME
Company Registration No.	N.A.
Announcement submitted on behalf of	RICKMERS MARITIME
Announcement is submitted with respect to *	RICKMERS MARITIME
Announcement is submitted by *	Lynn Wan Tiew Leng
Designation *	Company Secretary
Date & Time of Broadcast	01-Apr-2010 13:37:56
Announcement No.	00057

>> ANNOUNCEMENT DETAILS

The details of the announcement start here ...

Announcement Title *

RICKMERS MARITIME PROVIDES CLARIFICATION REGARDING TRADEWINDS ARTICLE

Description

Please see attached.

Attachments

Press_Release_Clarification_1_Apr_10_v2.pdf

Total size = 48K
(2048K size limit recommended)

x 0

why didn't buy S$0.510 yesterday ?

x 0

Thursday, 31 March 2010 4:41PM

S$0.455 ?

Nova07 ( Date: 30-Mar-2010 15:48) Posted:

Already up (0.48) 45.5% today. Hope to see it touch 0.50 by closing time.

x 0

tOday is LAST DAY Of wEEk

BEWARE AWARE CARE

pharoah88 ( Date: 01-Apr-2010 16:27) Posted:

4:26PM

SELLING at S$0.325 to BUYER QUEUE

pharoah88 ( Date: 01-Apr-2010 16:01) Posted:

lOOk like they are prOfit taking nOw.

may SELL dOwn to S$0.290 Or S$0.26

by END of day

APRIL'S FOOL

x 0

4:26PM

SELLING at S$0.325 to BUYER QUEUE

pharoah88 ( Date: 01-Apr-2010 16:01) Posted:

lOOk like they are prOfit taking nOw.

may SELL dOwn to S$0.290 Or S$0.26

by END of day

APRIL'S FOOL

x 0

In TRULY COMPETITIVE OPEN SECTORS,

PRICES can NEVER RISE.

AND FOREVER FALLS.

when SUPPLIES are NOT MANIPULATED AND SQUEEZED

E.g. PCs; TVs; Consumer Electronics, Garments,

FREEHOLD LANDED HOMES in JB

In MANIPULATED UNCOMPETITIVE TWISTED SECTORS,

PRiCES WiLL SURGE

when SUPPLIES are PURPOSELY RESTRICTED and DISTORTED.

E.g. Properties, Land, COEs, Medicines,

Luostock ( Date: 01-Apr-2010 14:07) Posted:

Changing to a smaller unit does NOT mean downgrade. Old folks do not have the energy to clean a big unit. Smaller unit can be also tastefully comfortable.

No rising valuation means losing to inflation as all other things will rise to about double the price in 10 yrs time.

x 0

these FOOLS QUEUE on

BOTH BUY (lOwer) and SELL [Higher] SiDES.

when yOu SELL tO BUYER QUEUE, they buy at lOwer PRiCE

when yOu BUY frOm SELLER QUEUE, they sell at Higher PRiCE

they make the SPREAD frOm bOth SiDES

regardless of whether yOu BUY Or SELL.

x 0

lOOk like they are prOfit taking nOw.

may SELL dOwn to S$0.290 Or S$0.26

by END of day

APRIL'S FOOL

x 0

Thursday, 1st APRIL 2010 3:12PM

APRIL FOOL is HERE

x 0

S$0.530 dOne

APRIL FOOLS are HERE

x 0

Thursday, 1st APRIL 2010

APRIL FOOL is HERE

S$0.360 is dOne

x 0

Thursday, 1st APRIL 2010 2:56pm

S$0.125 +S$0.020

x 0

this is a gOOd mOve.

what type Of pOwer is this ?

x 0

APRIL FOOL is HERE ?

x 0

Thursday, 1st APRIL 2010

APRIL FOOL is HERE

14:08.15 S$0.515 3,121,000 BOUGHT frOm SELLER

x 0

WHO are buying NOL shares at HiGHER and HIGHER PRiCES ?

Are majOrity sharehOlders buying ViA nOminEEs' accOunts ?

Are INsiders' buying ViA nOminEEs' accOunts

repOrted tO SGX?

is this a Requirement?

iF nOt, is this a lOOp hOle ?