|
Back
x 0
x 0
|
S$1.18
bOOmz
CHONG QING BLUE TWIN TOWERS 2010
Thursday: 15 APRIL 2010 CLOSING
2nd POSITION TOP VOLUME CHART
86,487,000 S$0.595 +S$0.035
S$0.560 6,505K (1,583K BfS)
S$0.565 5,728K (2,662K BfS) 900K MiD
S$0.570 3,219K (3,169K BfS)
S$0.575 2,798K (2,798K BfS)
S$0.580 3,376K (3,053K BfS)
S$0.582 250K MiD
S$0.585 9,272K (3,485K BfS)
S$0.590 10,434K (7,577K BfS)
S$0.592 7K MiD
S$0.595 30,058K (16,370K BfS)
S$0.600 14,012K (11,324K BfS)
S$0.605 828K (828K BfS)
XTRA STRONG underCurrent S$0.600
* * * * * * * *
16:20:39 S$0.600 1,370K BfS
16:20:37 S$0.600 2,100K BfS
16:20:32 S$0.600 3,000K BfS
16:03:16 S$0.595 2,060K BfS
15:57:42 S$0.590 2,950K BfS
15:01:19 S$0.595 1,962K BfS
14:44:31 S$0.595 3,000K BfS
14:43:55 S$0.590 3,647K BfS
14:35:43 S$0.585 1,850K BfS
14:35:08 S$0.580 2,000K BfS
14:30:00 S$0.570 2,200K BfS
12:22:04 S$0.565 1,305K BfS
|
Good Post
Bad Post
|
x 0
x 0
|
S$1.18
bOOmz
CHONG QING BLUE TWIN TOWERS 2010
Thursday: 15 APRIL 2010 CLOSING
2nd POSITION TOP VOLUME CHART
82,636,000 S$0.595 +S$0.035
S$0.560 6,505K (1,583K BfS)
S$0.565 5,728K (2,662K BfS) 900K MiD
S$0.570 3,219K (3,169K BfS)
S$0.575 2,798K (2,798K BfS)
S$0.580 3,376K (3,053K BfS)
S$0.582 250K MiD
S$0.585 9,272K (3,485K BfS)
S$0.590 10,434K (7,577K BfS)
S$0.592 7K MiD
S$0.595 24,379K (15,441K BfS)
S$0.600 13,937K (11,249K BfS)
S$0.605 828K (828K BfS)
* * * * * * * *
16:20:39 S$0.600 1,370K BfS
16:20:37 S$0.600 2,100K BfS
16:20:32 S$0.600 3,000K BfS
16:03:16 S$0.595 2,060K BfS
15:57:42 S$0.590 2,950K BfS
15:01:19 S$0.595 1,962K BfS
14:44:31 S$0.595 3,000K BfS
14:43:55 S$0.590 3,647K BfS
14:35:43 S$0.585 1,850K BfS
14:35:08 S$0.580 2,000K BfS
14:30:00 S$0.570 2,200K BfS
12:22:04 S$0.565 1,305K BfS
|
Good Post
Bad Post
|
x 0
x 0
|
S$1.18
bOOmz
CHONG QING BLUE TWIN TOWERS 2010
Ying Li |
Symbol: 5DM |
Currency: Singapore Dollar |
Last: |
0.595 |
+ 0.035 |
Vol (K): 49202.0 |
Trading |
Updated Time |
15-Apr 15:04 |
Open |
0.565 |
High |
0.6 |
Low |
0.56 |
Prev Close |
0.56 |
Buy |
- |
Sell |
- |
Volume(K) |
49202.0 |
Buy Vol(K) |
- |
Sell Vol(K) |
- |
52 Wk High |
0.895 |
52 Wk Low |
0.28 |
52 Wk Avg Vol |
3743.477 |
All Time High |
1.23 |
All Time Low |
0.055 |
|
|
Comments |
No Info |
*Reporting Currency in SGD Important: ShareJunction obtains our finance data from a third party. Check financial year before use. EPS values are recorded up to two decimal points.
Financials |
Date Updated |
31-Mar-2010 |
Financial Year |
31-Dec-2008 |
Current Year Profit (After Tax) $'000,000 |
357.439 |
Previous Year Profit (After Tax) $'000,000 |
659.432 |
Net Asset Per Share |
0.59 |
Turnover $'000,000 |
392.13 |
Current Year EPS (After Interest and Tax) |
0.17 |
Previous Year EPS (After Interest and Tax) |
0.3 |
PE Ratio (After Tax) |
3.0 |
Times Covered |
0.0 |
Price (at update time) |
0.51 |
Dividend Yield |
0.0 |
*Technical Analysis Information is updated Daily
Technicals |
RSI |
65.45 |
Williams %R |
-17.65 |
Comments (RSI) |
No Info |
Comments (W%R) |
Overbought |
Intraday Chart
|
Good Post
Bad Post
|
x 0
x 0
|
S$1.18
bOOmz
CHONG QING BLUE TWIN TOWERS 2010
bOOmz bOOmz
|
Good Post
Bad Post
|
x 0
x 0
|
|
Good Post
Bad Post
|
x 0
x 0
|
CHONG QING BLUE TWIN TOWERS 2010
bOOmz bOOmz
jUst BEGiNS
pharoah88 ( Date: 15-Apr-2010 12:18) Posted:
LAST PLACEMENT S$0.610
POSITION S$0.565 WINS |
|
|
Good Post
Bad Post
|
x 0
x 0
|
at One investment cOnference early 2010
One Fund dEclarEd that it was and
wOuld cOntinue tO accumulatE
YiNG Li unTiL it
bOOmz bOOmz bOOmz bOOmz bOOmz bOOmz
bOOmz bOOmz
|
Good Post
Bad Post
|
x 0
x 0
|
bOOMz
bOOmz
bOOmz
bOOmz
bOOmz
niuyear ( Date: 15-Apr-2010 14:03) Posted:
pharoah88 and yummygd are very strong supporters of this stock. :) Ying Li cheong..................
Why Chinese Property Isn't A Bubble
U.S. Global Investors thinks Chinese property bubble fears are well overblown due to a lack of long-term historical perspective. It's not just about where prices have come from in the last few years, but where they came from twenty years ago.
Thus while price rises may have seemed enormous recently, when put into long-term context, relative to China's massive GDP growth over the last two decades, then the rise in property prices since 2005 doesn't look too wild. The rise in prices has been far less than that of GDP since the late 1980's:
U.S. Global Investors:
Prior to the early 1990s, urban dwellers in China were provided an apartment by their employers or the government, with rent set at less than 5 percent of their salary (utilities included). Starting in the early 1990s, the government began to privatize housing by selling apartments to their residents at a low price. Almost overnight it created a private home ownership rate of about 70 percent.
This policy change was also a vast redistribution of wealth from the government to the people – those apartments typically occupied prime downtown locations, and thus are worth at least the price of a new luxury apartment.
...
The price of housing has roughly doubled since the late 1990s, but it’s important to remember that China’s prices have risen from a much lower base than in the developed countries (among them, Britain, Ireland and Spain) in which bubbles were created.
While admitting that property prices may have gone up too fast in signature cities such as Beijing and Shanghai, even these markets have seen their oversupply levels come down thanks to government initiatives to cool them.
Thus the message here is that China as a whole remains reasonable relative to the growth of the nation's economy and accompanying growth of Chinese spending power. In short, if your people's spending power doubles, then so can property prices.
It would be interesting to see the China property bears' counter to the first chart above.
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/why-china-property-isnt-a-bubble-2010-4#ixzz0l97GaBqr Ying Li Cheong............ |
|
|
Good Post
Bad Post
|
x 0
x 0
|
Conrad Raj
conrad@mediacorp.com.sg
C
As far as executive compensation is concerned, they do not feel the need to be fully transparent or to comply with the spirit of the Code of Corporate Governance.
While the global trend is to display greater transparency, these firms recede into their corporate shells when it comes to divulging the remuneration of their top five executives as the code would like them to do.
Their reticence or coyness in divulging key executives’ remuneration is blamed on keen competition for people in their sectors.
For instance, DBS says: “Although the Code recommends at least the top five key executives’s remuneration be disclosed within bands of $250,000, the Board believes this would be disadvantageous to the Group’s business interests, given the highly competitive conditions in the banking industry where poaching of executives is commonplace.”
The bank’s note is the typical explanation given in the annual reports of those who choose not to place their key executives’ packages under investor scrutiny.
But isn’t competition and poaching rampant throughout the corporate world?
Are the banking, medical and property sectors so unique that such concerns have to be held before the need for transparency?
It has been almost a decade since the Code (or rather, a recommendation of best practices) came into force in 2001.
Yet a study a couple of years ago by the CFA Institute Centre for Financial Market Integrity noted that the concept of individual accountability, particularly in the area of executive compensation, has a long way to go in Singapore. And little appears to have changed since then, too.
Disclosure practices here still badly need improvement. For sure, it is a far cry from the days when only total staff costs and total directors’ remuneration were provided in the annual reports.
But few companies listed on the SGX today comply fully with the spirit of the Code.
Most prefer to hide behind its “letter” and provide few details as to how the compensation, where disclosed, was arrived at.
If companies like Singapore Telecomunications, Sembcorp Industries and the Singapore Exchange can comply almost fully with the Code and disclose remuneration details — to the last dollar — of their board members and key executives, why can’t the others?
The Exchange could perhaps ask those companies, which excuse themselves from disclosing details of their executive compensation, more details on the kind of competition they face. It’s not as if the employees themselves keep their lips so tightly pursed that no one knows the compensation packages of the competition.
In fact, the code should be requiring all companies to provide full details of the board’s and key executives’ pay package, not just in bands of a quarter million dollars but down to the last cent. This would place all companies on a more level playing field.
While abuses in executive remuneration are not rampant here — nor as excessive as those in the United States where hundreds of millions of dollars are dished out to top executives, even when their decisions have had dire consequences for their companies
— transparency could ensure the possibility of abuse becomes even more remote here.
And competition for talent keeps everyone on their toes;
it should lead to improvements all round. ompetition is healthy, it’s said, but not everyone seems to agree. Ask City Developments, Raffles Medical and the three banks here — DBS Holdings, United Overseas Bank and Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation.
The writer is Today’s editor-at-large.
pharoah88 ( Date: 15-Apr-2010 14:03) Posted:
Comment &analysis today Thursday April 15, 2010 page 24
Why shy away from a little competition?
Not fully disclosing top executives’ pay goes against spirit of corporate governance code
pharoah88 ( Date: 15-Apr-2010 14:01) Posted:
If SingTel, Sembcorp and SGX can comply almost fully with the code and disclose remuneration details of board members and key executives,
why can’t the others? |
|
|
|
|
Good Post
Bad Post
|
x 0
x 0
|
Comment &analysis today Thursday April 15, 2010 page 24
Why shy away from a little competition?
Not fully disclosing top executives’ pay goes against spirit of corporate governance code
pharoah88 ( Date: 15-Apr-2010 14:01) Posted:
If SingTel, Sembcorp and SGX can comply almost fully with the code and disclose remuneration details of board members and key executives,
why can’t the others? |
|
|
Good Post
Bad Post
|
x 0
x 0
|
If SingTel, Sembcorp and SGX can comply almost fully with the code and disclose remuneration details of board members and key executives,
why can’t the others?
|
Good Post
Bad Post
|
x 0
x 0
|
this counter is tO shOrt S&P ?
|
Good Post
Bad Post
|
x 0
x 0
|
Voices today Thursday April 15, 2010 page20 i SAY
Murali Sharma
What about some comfort?
However, there are areas outside
the spectrum of frequencies and mechanical safety
that go towards a comfortable and safe journey.
A commuter needs to enjoy his journey —
that is the raison d’etre of a public transport company.
I
Every six months the Public Transport Council
conducts a service performance survey on buses.
The review seems to concentrate on passenger loading, bus breakdowns,
accidents, frequency of service, departure and arrival times.
However, there are areas outside
the spectrum of frequencies and mechanical safety that
go towards a comfortable and safe journey.
A commuter needs to enjoy his journey
— that is the raison d’etre of a public transport company.
A passenger must have enough leg room to get a comfortable ride.
Many seats are fitted too close to one another,
so that the hapless passenger is constrained to sit hunched.
Seats should be carefully spaced to avoid discomfort.
No doubt some spaces that cannot be used for sitting will result
but these can be used for placing bags and other articles.
A passenger should also be able to rest his elbow on the window sill.
Some sills are too narrow to allow for this.
Further, the “pillars” on windows are placed haphazardly
and prevent a commuter from placing his elbow on the sill.
These “pillars” should be re-positioned to just behind each seat
so that the space beside a passenger seat is clear.
Advertisements that occupy a substantial part of the windows,
robbing commuters of the chance to look out at the passing scene should not be allowed.
Advertisements should be only on the metal body of the buses and
not occupy any part of the windows.
On many buses, advertisements on the entire rear wall cuts off light.
The air-conditioning quite often does not serve its purpose as well,
ie to maintain internal temperature at a comfortable level.
It is always too warm or too cold.
One should not be sweating at the end of a longish journey or be freezing.
In some buses with a split-level floor,
the blower ducts in the front part of the vehicle are
too high for a passenger to adjust.
As for safety, the most dangerous seat on the bus is
the one just after the exit.
The grab bar in front of this seat is usually too far front
for a sitting passenger to grab in case
the driver applies the brakes suddenly.
In the event, it is likely that the passenger will be thrown forward violently
and hurt himself. refer to “Only one case of non-compliance” (April 6).
|
Good Post
Bad Post
|
x 0
x 0
|
NEWS today Thursday April 15, 2010 page 2
Growth forecast conservative: Analysts
They project 7.5% to 9.5% growth, optimistic about wages and jobs
Millet Enriquez
emelita@mediacorp.com.sg
SINGAPORE
On-year gross domestic product (GDP) growth of 13.1 per cent was the highest in 16 years, and with such a spectacular showing coming out of last year’s recession, analysts believe the economy can hit 8-percent growth for the full year — even if the rest of the quarters record disappointing growth.
Some felt the Government’s latest revised forecast was still too conservative. IMR Robert Prior-Wandesforde, senior Asian economist with HSBC in Singapore, said growth could average 9.1 per cent; Mr David Cohen, Action Economics’ director of economic forecasting for Asia, cited 9.5 per cent.
The strong showing will also translate into more jobs and lead unemployment levels to fall to below the 2 per cent level, resulting in technical “full employment” this year, the private sector economists said.
The services sector, which accounts for about 68 per cent of total employment here, is expected to be the main beneficiary. OCBC Bank’s head of Treasury Research and Strategy Unit, Ms Selena Ling, said: “With the integrated resorts coming onstream, demand for tourism-related manpower is expected to increase significantly.”
She also expects companies to adjust wages and bonuses to reflect the improved economic conditions, estimating nominal wage growth to be about 4 per cent on-year.
Better job prospects are already apparent in the manufacturing sector, the economy’s star performer with 139 per cent on-quarter growth in the first three months. Mr Renny Yeo, president of the Singapore Manufacturers’ Federation, said some of its members are already hiring but cautioned the spree could be curbed by the rising labour costs and the Government’s plans to tighten its foreign worker levy policy.
Still, analysts reckon the spectacular growth in the manufacturing sector, which was supported by the biomedical and electronics sector, may not be sustainable. “At some stage, the restocking momentum will also start to fade off,” said Mr Kit Wei Zheng, economist at Citigroup.
DBS economist Irvin Seah agreed and said he expects a pullback in the pharmaceutical sector due to the industry’s volatile nature.
Going forward, the services sector will likely become the economy’s new star performer as it is poised for record growth, economists said.
“Export orientated industries will also continue to benefit from the extremely strong and, in my view, sustainable recovery in the regional trade cycle,” said HSBC’s Prior Wandesforde. — After the first quarter’s stunning performance, private sector economists are now revising their growth forecast up for the year to between 7.5 per cent and 9.5 per cent, a tad higher than the Government’s revised projections announced yesterday.
|
Good Post
Bad Post
|
x 0
x 0
|
TODAY ONLINE Thursday: 15 APRIL 2010
from broke rage research and agen cy reports
Disclaimer: Readers should seek independent financial advice before making any investment decision. Today cannot be held liable for any consequence arising from the use of this information.
Stock Calls
55 cents | Hold Sinotel
DBS Vickers downgrades Sinotel Technologies to Hold from Buy. Cuts target price to 61 cents. Cuts FY10-11 earnings estimates by 8 to 12 per cent to assume weaker margins.
Says China-based supplier of wireless telecom services and equipment needs to deliver gross margins of over 35 per cent, better manage cash to avoid more fund raising after two recent share placement exercises.
|
Good Post
Bad Post
|
x 0
x 1
|
TODAY ONLINE Thursday: 15 APRIL 2010
from broke rage research and agen cy reports
Disclaimer: Readers should seek independent financial advice before making any investment decision. Today cannot be held liable for any consequence arising from the use of this information.
Stock Calls
SPH
$3.97 | Neutral
Macquarie downgrades Singapore Press Holdings to Neutral, cuts target price to $4.12 after lowering EPS estimates to assume higher staff costs, lower investment income. Notes Q2 staff costs higher than expected, investment income below view. Says while print advertising recovery over next two quarters will be positive for SPH, higher costs will offset benefits.
Sinotel
55 cents | Hold
DBS Vickers downgrades Sinotel Technologies to Hold from Buy. Cuts target price to 61 cents. Cuts FY10-11 earnings estimates by 8 to 12 per cent to assume weaker margins.
Says China-based supplier of wireless telecom services and equipment needs to deliver gross margins of over 35 per cent, better manage cash to avoid more fund raising after two recent share placement exercises.
|
Good Post
Bad Post
|
x 0
x 0
|
HiGH cOst
lOw margin
Livermore ( Date: 14-Apr-2010 20:07) Posted:
As I said this is a poor counter to trade so I am puzzled why the "experienced traders" want to trade this.
Livermore ( Date: 08-Apr-2010 21:35) Posted:
This a poor counter to trade. |
|
|
|
|
Good Post
Bad Post
|
x 0
x 0
|
LAST PLACEMENT S$0.610
POSITION S$0.565 WINS
|
Good Post
Bad Post
|
x 0
x 0
|
Shun Zi says,
"To WIN, One must NEVER lOse"
"pOsitiOn Oneself WHERE One WiLL NEVER lOse"
pharoah88 ( Date: 15-Apr-2010 11:24) Posted:
CHONG QING BLUE TWIN TOWERS 2010
ZHi zi says,
"yOu THiNK yOu can, yOu WiN"
"yOu THiNK yOu can'T yOu lOse" |
|
|
Good Post
Bad Post
|
x 0
x 0
|
it is a mild recovery ?
warren_buffet ( Date: 13-Apr-2010 11:36) Posted:
this will be the HIGH of 2010, though not all time high. You can be rest assured gentleman.
KiLrOy ( Date: 21-Mar-2010 17:42) Posted:
Take a longer view approach for this counter if you can else split half holding for long view approach if you arent comfortable.
A 52 weeks daily chart shows a mild uptrend and price action contained within the channel.
A bigger picture hopfully to rest assured we are not at the all time high.
|
|
|
|
|
Good Post
Bad Post
|
|
|
|